23.1324, Calls: Syntax, Morphology, Typology, Historical Ling, Ling Theories/UK

linguist at linguistlist.org linguist at linguistlist.org
Thu Mar 15 16:16:40 UTC 2012


LINGUIST List: Vol-23-1324. Thu Mar 15 2012. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 23.1324, Calls: Syntax, Morphology, Typology, Historical Ling, Ling Theories/UK

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: Veronika Drake, U of Wisconsin-Madison
Monica Macaulay, U of Wisconsin-Madison
Rajiv Rao, U of Wisconsin-Madison
Joseph Salmons, U of Wisconsin-Madison
Anja Wanner, U of Wisconsin-Madison
       <reviews at linguistlist.org>

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

The LINGUIST List is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing the
discipline of linguistics with the infrastructure necessary to function in
the digital world. Donate to keep our services freely available!
https://linguistlist.org/donation/donate/donate1.cfm

Editor for this issue: Alison Zaharee <alison at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  

Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated
from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships:
          http://multitree.linguistlist.org/
					
					
LINGUIST is pleased to announce an exciting service:  
Easy Abstracts! Easy Abs is a free abstract submission and review facility 
designed to help conference organizers and reviewers accept and process 
abstracts online.  Just go to: http://www.linguistlist.org/confcustom, and 
begin your conference customization process today! With Easy Abstracts, 
submission and review will be as easy as 1-2-3!

Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:15:49
From: Michelle Sheehan [mls54 at cam.ac.uk]
Subject: Workshop on Case at Linguistics Association of Great Britain Annual Meeting

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=23-1324.html&submissionid=4542626&topicid=3&msgnumber=1
 
Full Title: Workshop on Case at Linguistics Association of Great Britain Annual Meeting 2012 
Short Title: Case at LAGB 

Date: 05-Sep-2012 - 05-Sep-2012
Location: Salford, Manchester, United Kingdom 
Contact Person: Michelle Sheehan
Meeting Email: mls54 at cam.ac.uk
Web Site: http://www.lagb.org.uk/salford2012/workshop 

Linguistic Field(s): Historical Linguistics; Linguistic Theories; Morphology; Syntax; Typology 

Call Deadline: 14-Apr-2012 

Meeting Description:

Workshop on Case
Linguistics Association of Great Britain Annual Meeting 2012
University of Salford, Manchester
Wednesday, 5 September 2012
Organised by Michelle Sheehan, Anders Holmberg and Alison Biggs
http://www.lagb.org.uk/salford2012/workshop

Plenary Speaker:

Prof. Mark Baker (Rutgers): 'Parameters of Case Marking'

Since Vergnaud (1977), abstract/structural Case has arguably been one of the core explanatory ideas in generative syntactic theory. The Case Filter in conjunction with Burzio's (1986: 178) Generalisation (whereby '[a]ll and only the verbs that can assign a θ-role to the subject can assign accusative Case to an object') provide an elegant account of the distribution of overt nominals as well as various kinds of A-movement in many well-studied languages (i.e. raising, short and long passivisation, and in some recent proposals Obligatory Control). Despite these numerous empirical advantages, though, the rationale for abstract Case has long remained mysterious and this is particularly true in the context of the Minimalist Program. As Pesetsky & Torrego (2011: 52) note, the principles of case assignment 'look quite specific to syntax and morphology, with little apparent connection to external cognitive systems'. While it is possible to stipulate that the requirement for Case is imposed by PF, rephrasing Vergnaud's approach, or 'LF-visibility' there seems to be no clear reason why the interfaces should impose such a requirement on DPs.

In addition to these conceptual issues, exciting empirical challenges have arisen for standard Case theory from the study of a broad range of the world's languages. One obvious example is syntactic ergativity, as discussed by Dixon (1994) and many others, but systematic variation has long been observed in causative constructions (cf. Kayne 1975, Baker 1988) and ditransitives (Dryer 1987, Haspelmath 2005). Moreover, it appears that languages may even vary as to their sensitivity to Case-related locality effects such as dative intervention (cf. McGuiness 1998) and the Person Case Constraint (cf. Bonet 1991, 1994, Anagnostopoulou 2003, Béjar & Rezac 2009). Partly because of variation of this kind, some people have explored the possibility of eliminating structural Case altogether. Thus Marantz (1991) takes dependent Case/case to be assigned in the morphology (cf. also McFadden 2004, Landau 2006, Sigurðsson 2008, 2012). Baker (2008) and Baker & Vinokurova (2010) take a more nuanced approach, arguing that both agree-related structural Case and a version of dependent Case are required, with some languages even employing both possibilities. 

Call for Papers:
 
In connection with Mark Baker's Henry Sweet Lecture, we invite papers on topics related to the status of Case in current syntactic theory, which address one or more of the following questions: Do all languages have structural Case? Is there a need for one or more Case parameters? Is Case strictly a PF-phenomenon? What revisions are forced to the standard picture by novel case-related data? What is the status of non-structural (inherent and lexical) case (cf. Chomsky 1981, Woolford 2006), and how do they interact with structural Case? Are genitive/dative structural Cases? How can ergative alignment be accommodated in the standard picture? Is A-movement always triggered by the unavailability of Case? Is defective intervention a universal principle of grammar? What is the relation, if any, between Case and agreement? Is there a relation between pro-drop and Case? Does PRO have Case? How can interactions between Case/case and information structure be modeled? Can Case have LF-related functions, or is it strictly uninterpretable?

How and When to Submit an Abstract:

Both members and non-members are invited to offer papers for the Workshop on Case.

The normal length for papers delivered at LAGB meetings is 25 minutes (plus 15 minutes discussion). The deadline for submissions is Saturday, 14 April 2012.

All enquiries about abstract submission should be directed to the Meetings Secretary, Oliver Bond (o.l.bond at salford.ac.uk).

Each person is permitted to submit a maximum of one single-authored paper and one-joint authored paper. All abstracts should be submitted electronically using EasyChair, which can be accessed at the following address:

https://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=lagb2012

To be able to submit an abstract you must first sign up for an EasyChair account to access the LAGB submission page. Once you have created an account, please click on the New Submission link and follow the instructions on screen.

If you are applying for a conference bursary, your abstract should be submitted in the normal way using the EasyChair system, but you must also fill in a bursary application form on the LAGB website:

http://www.lagb.org.uk/bursaries-form

Abstract Format:

Abstracts must be no longer than one A4 page with margins of at least 2.5cm on all sides. Only the first page of any abstract submitted will be considered - no appendices or pages for references can be accepted. If the formatting instructions are not followed the abstract may not be considered. You may use single spacing but type must be no smaller than 12 points. Please indicate clearly on the anonymous abstract that your presentation is intended for the 'Workshop on Case'.

Abstracts must be submitted anonymously and should include no indication of the author's identity. The submitted files should be in one of the following formats: pdf (preferred), or Word (doc, docx), or plain text. Any phonetic characters should either be embedded in a pdf file, or be in the Doulos SIL font, which can be downloaded for free from this site: 

http://scripts.sil.org/DoulosSIL_download






------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This Year the LINGUIST List hopes to raise $67,000. This money will go to help 
keep the List running by supporting all of our Student Editors for the coming
year.

See below for donation instructions, and don't forget to check out Fund 
Drive 2012 site!

http://linguistlist.org/fund-drive/2012/

There are many ways to donate to LINGUIST!

You can donate right now using our secure credit card form at  
https://linguistlist.org/donation/donate/donate1.cfm

Alternatively you can also pledge right now and pay later. To do so, go to: 
https://linguistlist.org/donation/pledge/pledge1.cfm

For all information on donating and pledging, including information on how to 
donate by check, money order, or wire transfer, please visit: 
http://linguistlist.org/donation/

The LINGUIST List is under the umbrella of Eastern Michigan University and as 
such can receive donations through the EMU Foundation, which is a registered 
501(c) Non Profit organization. Our Federal Tax number is 38-6005986. These 
donations can be offset against your federal and sometimes your state tax
return (U.S. tax payers only). For more information visit the IRS Web-Site,
or contact your financial advisor.

Many companies also offer a gift matching program, such that they will match 
any gift you make to a non-profit organization. Normally this entails your 
contacting your human resources department and sending us a form that the 
EMU Foundation fills in and returns to your employer. This is generally a
simple administrative procedure that doubles the value of your gift to
LINGUIST, without costing you an extra penny. Please take a moment to check if
your company operates such a program.

Thank you very much for your support of LINGUIST!
 


----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-23-1324	
----------------------------------------------------------
Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated
from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships:
          http://multitree.linguistlist.org/
					
					



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list