23.4965, Qs: Syllabic Stress Violations

linguist at linguistlist.org linguist at linguistlist.org
Wed Nov 28 17:25:07 UTC 2012


LINGUIST List: Vol-23-4965. Wed Nov 28 2012. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 23.4965, Qs: Syllabic Stress Violations

Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
            Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: Veronika Drake, U of Wisconsin Madison
Monica Macaulay, U of Wisconsin Madison
Rajiv Rao, U of Wisconsin Madison
Joseph Salmons, U of Wisconsin Madison
Anja Wanner, U of Wisconsin Madison
       <reviews at linguistlist.org>

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

Do you want to donate to LINGUIST without spending an extra penny? Bookmark
the Amazon link for your country below; then use it whenever you buy from
Amazon!

USA: http://www.amazon.com/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlist-20
Britain: http://www.amazon.co.uk/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlist-21
Germany: http://www.amazon.de/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlistd-21
Japan: http://www.amazon.co.jp/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlist-22
Canada: http://www.amazon.ca/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlistc-20
France: http://www.amazon.fr/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlistf-21

For more information on the LINGUIST Amazon store please visit our
FAQ at http://linguistlist.org/amazon-faq.cfm.

Editor for this issue: Brent Miller <brent at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  


Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 12:25:01
From: Mark Seidenberg [seidenberg at wisc.edu]
Subject: Syllabic Stress Violations

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=23-4965.html&submissionid=5012809&topicid=8&msgnumber=1
 
There is a familiar alternation in English such that a disyllabic word with
weak-strong syllabic stress is a verb and the strong-weak pattern is a noun
(e.g., PERMIT, CONSORT, ARRAY etc.).  There are exceptions to this pattern,
e.g., RELEASE for which both noun and verb are WS, and many others.  My
question is whether the standard pattern ever perfectly reverses:  a word for
which the WS form is the noun and the SW is the verb.  I am not aware of any.

Although the query is about a narrow corner of English, there is some broader
interest in the extent to which languages tolerate deviations from
rules/central tendencies.  If this kind of reversal does not occur in the
above case, is it attested in other languages or components of language?

Apologies in advance if the question is a linguistically naive one covered in
the first chapter of someone's textbook (though the reference would be
appreciated nonetheless!).
 

Linguistic Field(s): Phonology

Subject Language(s): English (eng)






----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-23-4965	
----------------------------------------------------------



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list