24.4946, Calls: Ling Theories, Philosophy of Lang, Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics/Italy
linguist at linguistlist.org
linguist at linguistlist.org
Thu Dec 5 14:59:13 UTC 2013
LINGUIST List: Vol-24-4946. Thu Dec 05 2013. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.
Subject: 24.4946, Calls: Ling Theories, Philosophy of Lang, Syntax, Semantics, Pragmatics/Italy
Moderator: Damir Cavar, Eastern Michigan U <damir at linguistlist.org>
Monica Macaulay, U of Wisconsin Madison
Rajiv Rao, U of Wisconsin Madison
Joseph Salmons, U of Wisconsin Madison
Mateja Schuck, U of Wisconsin Madison
Anja Wanner, U of Wisconsin Madison
<reviews at linguistlist.org>
Do you want to donate to LINGUIST without spending an extra penny? Bookmark
the Amazon link for your country below; then use it whenever you buy from
For more information on the LINGUIST Amazon store please visit our
FAQ at http://linguistlist.org/amazon-faq.cfm.
Editor for this issue: Bryn Hauk <bryn at linguistlist.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 09:58:59
From: Michelangelo Falco [michelangelo.falco at unitn.it]
Subject: Workshop 'Specificity in the Grammar: Form and Interpretation'
E-mail this message to a friend:
Full Title: Workshop 'Specificity in the Grammar: Form and Interpretation'
Short Title: Specificity
Date: 12-Feb-2014 - 12-Feb-2014
Location: Trento, Italy
Contact Person: Michelangelo Falco
Meeting Email: michelangelo.falco at unitn.it
Web Site: http://clic.cimec.unitn.it/specificity
Linguistic Field(s): Linguistic Theories; Philosophy of Language; Pragmatics; Semantics; Syntax
Call Deadline: 15-Dec-2013
While a number of formal notions of specificity have been proposed by semanticists and philosophers of language, many facets of the use and referential status of different indefinite noun phrases still remain unclear.
Researchers who worked on (non-)specificity have proposed to characterise this dimension of meaning either as a property of indefinite noun phrases and their modifiers (e.g. presence of 'certain/specific', absence of overt determiners), or as a phenomenon that encompasses the whole sentence or even the discourse. In the first approach, understanding specificity requires formulating an explanatory description of the set of lexical, morphological and structural cues that signal (non-)specificity, in different languages. In the second, specificity also interacts with many well-studied phenomena in sentential semantics and discourse, such as sentential genericity, verbal aspect, operator scope, and topic/focus.
In addition, the topic of specificity has been explored by researchers from different traditions of language study. Scholars interested in the syntax/semantics interface have tried to capture it using the rich functional structure put forth by the Italian 'cartographic' tradition, insofar this encodes features of context and discourse (D-linking, topic/focus). A second perspective, mostly advocated by philosophers of language, resorts to a rich semantic encoding of crucial aspects of the context of utterance, at some linguistic level (LF?). Yet others have argued in favour of a purely pragmatic account. An important general question is thus whether some of these approaches can or should be integrated.
Beyond its intrinsic theoretical interest, a better understanding of the cues and features of (non-)specificity would have an impact on the possibility to carry out automatic mark-ups of different types of indefinites in large corpora, and would bear on studies of the acquisition of noun phrases by children which go beyond the definite/indefinite divide.
This workshop aims to address the following questions:
- Which types of specificity do actually exists, and to what extent the many notions advanced in the literature can be derived one from the other?
- What are the observable morpho-syntactic phenomena related to the different notions of specificity in different languages, and what do they tell us about indefinites in general?
- How does specificity interact with non-specificity, referentiality, definiteness, genericity?
- Which cues for specificity might lead to computationally viable tools for marking it automatically?
- What can acquisition studies tell us about the notion of specificity?
Adriana Belletti (Università di Siena)
Valentina Bianchi (Università di Siena)
Manuel Leonetti (Universidad de Alcalá)
Yoad Winter (Utrecht University)
The workshop will be followed by the 40th Incontro di Grammatica Generativa (IGG40): http://events.unitn.it/en/igg40.
Final Call for Papers:
Authors are asked to submit their abstracts as PDF files via EasyAbs at the following address: http://linguistlist.org/easyabs/specificity.
Submissions should be anonymous and not reveal the identity of the author(s) in any form (e.g., references, file name of the abstract).
Abstracts should not exceed two pages in length (including examples and references), in 12-point type, Times font, single line spacing, 2.5cm/1inch margins.
Talks will be 30 minutes + 10 minutes for discussion.
Notification of acceptance: no later than 12 January 2014.
LINGUIST List: Vol-24-4946
More information about the Linguist