24.361, Diss: Cognitive Science/ Discourse Analysis/ Philosophy of Language/ Pragmatics: Kapogianni: ' Irony and the Literal Versus Nonliteral Distinction...'
linguist at linguistlist.org
linguist at linguistlist.org
Mon Jan 21 16:56:53 UTC 2013
LINGUIST List: Vol-24-361. Mon Jan 21 2013. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.
Subject: 24.361, Diss: Cognitive Science/ Discourse Analysis/ Philosophy of Language/ Pragmatics: Kapogianni: ' Irony and the Literal Versus Nonliteral Distinction...'
Moderators: Anthony Aristar, Eastern Michigan U <aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Aristar-Dry, Eastern Michigan U <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Reviews: Veronika Drake, U of Wisconsin Madison
Monica Macaulay, U of Wisconsin Madison
Rajiv Rao, U of Wisconsin Madison
Joseph Salmons, U of Wisconsin Madison
Anja Wanner, U of Wisconsin Madison
<reviews at linguistlist.org>
Do you want to donate to LINGUIST without spending an extra penny? Bookmark
the Amazon link for your country below; then use it whenever you buy from
For more information on the LINGUIST Amazon store please visit our
FAQ at http://linguistlist.org/amazon-faq.cfm.
Editor for this issue: Lili Xia <lxia at linguistlist.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 11:56:16
From: Eleni Kapogianni [kapogiane322 at yahoo.co.uk]
Subject: Irony and the Literal Versus Nonliteral Distinction: A typological approach with focus on ironic implicature strength
E-mail this message to a friend:
Institution: Cambridge University
Program: PhD in Linguistics
Dissertation Status: Completed
Degree Date: 2012
Author: Eleni Kapogianni
Dissertation Title: Irony and the Literal Versus Nonliteral Distinction: A
typological approach with focus on ironic implicature
Linguistic Field(s): Cognitive Science
Philosophy of Language
Katarzyna M. Jaszczolt
This thesis approaches the phenomenon of verbal irony from a definitional and
typological perspective, with the aim of detecting the principal factors that affect
the derivation and strength of ironic meaning.
A preliminary step for this analysis is the treatment of the definitional problem of
verbal irony, achieved through the postulation of a set of necessary and jointly
sufficient conditions for the presence of the phenomenon. Subsequently, with
evidence from the study of a wide array of irony strategies, two main types of the
phenomenon are distinguished on the basis of the relationship between the
expressed and the intended meaning of the ironic utterance. The proposed irony
types are examined in relation to different factors that may affect the strength of
the ironic implicature, i.e. the level of confidence of the hearers about an ironic
interpretation of the utterance and the difficulty by which the speaker can cancel
(in the Gricean notion of explicit cancellability – Grice 1975) this interpretation.
Five main factors are examined both theoretically and experimentally: derivation
syllogism, necessary assumptions, context dependence, co-textual
reinforcement, and the use of discourse frameworks (particularly the
The results of this examination show that the influence of different factors of
strength on the derivation of the two main irony types and their subtypes
correlates with the observation of significant differences in (ironic) implicature
strength. These results lead to the consideration of factors of implicature strength
as a helpful means of categorisation of inferential meaning, which cuts across
the literal-nonliteral divide, being able to provide distinctions within levels of
meaning that had so far been considered rather unified.
LINGUIST List: Vol-24-361
More information about the Linguist