24.2982, Review: Pragmatics; Computational Linguistics: Herring, Stein, and Virtanen (eds., 2013)

linguist at linguistlist.org linguist at linguistlist.org
Tue Jul 23 03:10:11 UTC 2013


LINGUIST List: Vol-24-2982. Mon Jul 22 2013. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 24.2982, Review: Pragmatics; Computational Linguistics: Herring, Stein, and Virtanen (eds., 2013)

Moderator: Damir Cavar, Eastern Michigan U <damir at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: Veronika Drake, U of Wisconsin Madison
Monica Macaulay, U of Wisconsin Madison
Rajiv Rao, U of Wisconsin Madison
Joseph Salmons, U of Wisconsin Madison
Mateja Schuck, U of Wisconsin Madison
Anja Wanner, U of Wisconsin Madison
       <reviews at linguistlist.org>

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

Do you want to donate to LINGUIST without spending an extra penny? Bookmark
the Amazon link for your country below; then use it whenever you buy from
Amazon!

USA: http://www.amazon.com/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlist-20
Britain: http://www.amazon.co.uk/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlist-21
Germany: http://www.amazon.de/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlistd-21
Japan: http://www.amazon.co.jp/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlist-22
Canada: http://www.amazon.ca/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlistc-20
France: http://www.amazon.fr/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlistf-21

For more information on the LINGUIST Amazon store please visit our
FAQ at http://linguistlist.org/amazon-faq.cfm.

Editor for this issue: Anja Wanner <anja at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  


Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 23:09:28
From: Daria Dayter [coocho at gmail.com]
Subject: Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=24-2982.html&submissionid=11721181&topicid=9&msgnumber=1
 
Discuss this message: 
http://linguistlist.org/pubs/reviews/get-review.cfm?subid=11721181


Book announced at http://linguistlist.org/issues/24/24-519.html

EDITOR: Susan C. Herring
EDITOR: Dieter  Stein
EDITOR: Tuija  Virtanen
TITLE: Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication
SERIES TITLE: Handbooks of Pragmatics [HOPS] 9
PUBLISHER: De Gruyter Mouton
YEAR: 2013

REVIEWER: Daria Dayter, Universität Bayreuth

SUMMARY

The volume under review is the ninth, and final, addition to the comprehensive
series Handbooks of Pragmatics edited by Wolfram Bublitz, Andreas Jucker and
Klaus Schneider. “Pragmatics of Computer-Mediated Communication” (CMC),
however, is different from other books in the series. It deals with a
relatively young field and therefore grapples with an emergent picture, rather
than presenting canonized knowledge. The format of contributions is also
different from that typically found in the genre of a handbook – the majority
of articles in the volume combine a review of existing research with case
studies.

29 contributions are written by specialists in the field of CMC, and
established names such as Jannis Androutsopoulos, Christa Dürscheid, Susan
Herring, Theresa Heyd and many others immediately recommend the volume to the
reader. The introductory chapter by Susan Herring, Dieter Stein, and Tuija
Virtanen is an insightful review of the key issues and trends in the field and
provides a perfect point of entry into the study of CMC. The rest of the
handbook is divided into 5 parts:

Part I (“Pragmatics of computer-mediated modes”, Chapters 2-9) is devoted to
characterizing individual modes of CMC such as synchronous chat, blogging etc.
with particular focus on the pragmatic implications of the medium. For
instance, in “Email communication” Christa Dürscheid and Carmen Frehner, along
with naming the oft-cited structural markers such as lexical abbreviation,
syntactic reduction, non-standard punctuation and emulated prosody (p.42),
bring to attention the novel usage of greeting and farewell formulae and
explicit indicators of illocutionary force such as emoticons (pp.43-45).
Continuing with an overview of two key theoretical models, Koch and
Oesterreicher's (1985) orality-literacy model and Herring's (2004)
computer-mediated discourse analytic approach, the authors conclude that a
number of factors have a bearing on email's future development: move of email
to mobile devices, growing amount of spam, and rise in popularity of personal
social networking services. The subject of email is taken up by Helmut Gruber
in “Mailing list communication,” where he reviews studies based on data from
electronic mailing lists. Chapter 4, “Blogging,” by Cornelius Puschmann,
discusses difficulties of defining a blog. These are aggravated by the skewed
image of blogs in public discourse, which ”often implicitly takes highly
visible topical blogs and casts them as typical or model instantiations”
(p.88). Importantly, Puschmann recognizes that many key issues, such as the
motivation to blog, the role blogging plays for a community, and the
reflections of practitioners on their practice, lie outside the scope of
purely linguistic analysis and call for interdisciplinary attention. The
following two chapters, “Real-time chat” by John Paolillo and Asta
Zelenkauskaite, and “Instant messaging” by Naomi Baron, are devoted to
synchronous communication online. While the former deals with pragmatics of
various multiparticipant chat modes (Multi-User Dungeon, Multi-User Dungeon
object-oriented, AOL chat, Internet Relay Chat), the latter zooms in on
personal instant messaging and specific phenomena such as away messages.
Finally, the data in the last three chapters in this section is comparatively
new to CMC and comes from interaction mediated by mobile devices, as well as
non-text-based interaction (although the distinction between CMC and mobile
communication has been blurring for some time (Tagg 2012)). Crispin Thurlow
and Michele Poff in “Text messaging” provide a wide overview of existing
research and come to the conclusion that since most commentary on texting as
discursive practice is a-pragmatic, further research in this direction is
warranted. Rich Ling and Naomi Baron in “Mobile phone communication” identify
factors affecting pragmatics of everyday mobile phone use: cost issues,
emancipation of adolescents, fashion, cultural expectations regarding
availability, and choice of mode of communication (p. 199). “Synchronous
voice-based computer-mediated communication,” by Christopher Jenks and Alan
Firth, takes a conversation analytic approach to Skypecasts and similar audio
chat rooms.

In Part II (“Classic pragmatic phenomena in computer-mediated communication”,
Chapters 10-15) traditional pragmatic concepts of relevance, performativity
and speech acts are examined in CMC environments. Looking at chat data, Susan
Herring in “Relevance in computer-mediated conversation” finds that
requirement of optimal relevance is relaxed in recreational CMC and that this
loosened relevance is often exploited for playful effect. Synchronous chat
makes another appearance in Tuija Virtainen’s “Performativity in
computer-mediated communication” along with informal online discussions on a
discussion board. Virtainen construes third-person emotes in social MUD and
IRC and “mock performatives” (p.280) in forum postings as two types of the
same phenomenon: an etiolated (“parasitic”) performative (p.273). Chapter 12,
“Address in computer-mediated communication,” by Sandi Michele de Oliveira,
provides an overview of the study of address from both general and pragmatic
perspective. In conclusion, Oliveira raises research concerns such as
preponderance of the essentialist view of identity, interpretative imprecision
and lack of studies taking a discursive approach to address. The final three
chapters of this section explore how CMC environment affects strategic
language use. Sandra Harrison and Diane Allton in “Apologies in email
discussion” report a case study that demonstrates that some apologising
patterns, especially those accompanying trivial offences, deviate from offline
interaction. In contrast to face-to-face interaction, the offence cannot be
deduced from the physical context and has to be mentioned in the message along
with the apology; the apology itself is often formulaic, and constitutes a
symbol of adherence to group norms rather than genuine expression of regret.
Miriam Locher in “Internet advice” examines advice-giving in a health advice
column online and finds three main types of advice realization: declaratives,
interrogatives inviting introspection or action, and imperatives inviting
introspection or action (p. 346). Locher explains specific features of
advice-giving in this environment (non-directness, lack of emoticons and
non-standard spelling etc.) by referring to medium and situational factors,
e.g. anonymity, message format, participant characteristics, purpose and tone,
and hypothesises that advice-giving patterns might differ in other CMC
environments. The section ends with Jaffrey Hancock’s and Amy Gonzales’
chapter “Deception in computer-mediated communication”, which first reviews
feature-based approaches to deception and technology, and then addresses the
linguistic aspects of deception on the internet. As research demonstrated,
people tend to be more verbose when telling the truth than when lying. In
regard to pronouns, lies online include more other-references but less
self-references. Finally, emotive terms, especially negatively loaded ones,
occur more frequently in online deception.

Part III (“Pragmatics of computer-mediated communication phenomena”, Chapters
16-19) mostly focuses on issues of authenticity and self-presentation in CMC.
Theresa Heyd in “Email hoaxes” outlines distinctive features of the genre and
discusses the communicative status of hoax emails against the backdrop of
Grice’s Cooperative Principle and speech act theory. Martin Gill in
“Authentication and Nigerian Letters” addresses contradictory linguistic
practices of so-called ‘419’ scams, fraud emails in which the author purports
to be a fugitive politician or financier from an African contry, asking the
addressee to transfer some emergency funds in exchange for generous reward in
the future. These letters include an abundance of authenticating features but
fail to create a consistent and coherent authentic identity. “The maxims of
online nicknames” by Loukia Lindholm applies Grice’s Conversational Maxims to
the analysis of screen names on a forum for parents and another one for
photographers. The last contribution of this section, “Micro-linguistic
structural features of computer-mediated communication” by Markus Bieswanger,
places emphasis on structural rather than pragmatic features of CMC.
Bieswanger reiterates the thought that has frequently appeared throughout the
volume – there is no single Netspeak variety (see Crystal 2001 for the
original Netspeak argument), and language use online is shaped by a host of
use- and user-related factors.

Part IV (“Discourse pragmatics of computer-mediated interaction”, Chapters
20-26) subsumes conversation analytic approaches to the subject matter. Rodney
Jones opens the section with an account of a little-researched conversational
phenomena, “Rhythm and timing in chat room interaction”. He observes that
turn-taking in chats is organized in a complex system of quickening and
slowing rhythms – “bursts and breaks” of interaction (p. 500) – that allows
for conversational synchrony in several simultaneously maintained chats. The
following four chapters -- “Conversational floor in computer-mediated
discourse” by James Simpson, “Conversational coherence in small group chat” by
Kris Markman, “Repair in chat room interaction” by Jennifer Baker Jacobs and
Angela Cora Garcia, and “Responses and non-responses in workplace emails” by
Karianne Skovholt and Jan Svennevig – all, in their own way,  warn against
blindly taking over the analytical toolkit from the study of face-to-face
communication despite apparent similarities across online and offline
contexts. Amelie Hössjer in “Small talk, politeness, and email communication
in the workplace” demonstrates through a comparison of two email corpora, one
of a virtual and one of a physically based community of practice, that small
talk has a much more prominent position in the online communication of the
former type of community. The last empirical chapter of the volume is “Flaming
and linguistic impoliteness on a listserv” by Brenda Danet. This chapter
comprises a short overview of research on flaming and a study of a conflict on
an electronic mailing list of Israelis in the US.

Part V (“Broader perspectives”, Chapters 27-29) broadens the scope by tackling
the overarching concepts of code-switching, genre and narrativity. Jannis
Androutsopoulos in “Code-switching in computer-mediated communication” notes
that traditional frameworks may not be entirely suitable to the analysis of
CMC. A handy summary of existing research on code-switching in CMC in a table
form is expanded and discussed in the remainder of the chapter.
Androutsopoulos concludes with a call for more research on a private dyadic
data which has been underrepresented in CMC scholarship so far. Alexandra
Georgakopoulou in “Narrative analysis and computer-mediated communication”
traces the development of research on narrative from fictional storytelling to
everyday life narratives by ordinary people, which are prevalent in social
media. Finally, “Genre and computer-mediated communication” by Janet Giltrow
presents a review of genre study off- and online, and throws a glance back at
the Part III articles from a genre standpoint.

EVALUATION

If, as the title suggests, the aim of this handbook was to provide articles
for ready reference on a broad variety of topics in CMC, it definitely has
succeeded. The scope of the book, which spans description of individual CMC
modes, analysis of traditional and CMC-specific pragmatic phenomena, and wider
theoretical and methodological issues of Internet studies, makes it
potentially useful as a course book or a reference work. While readers from
outside the discipline will appreciate the comprehensive treatment of the
topic, the original research and critical perspectives will make the volume
interesting to the experienced CMC scholars as well.

As mentioned earlier, contributions are somewhat heterogeneous and range from
encyclopedic articles reviewing existing research (e.g. Ch. 2, 19, 27, 29) to
articles with minimal literature reviews and basis on case studies (e.g. Ch.
13, 18, 20, 25). Many theoretical sections overlap in their account of such
key issues as speech act theory, Cooperative Principle, or Brown & Levinson’s
(1987) Politeness Theory, which is understandable given the pragmatic focus of
the volume. Indeed, this is an advantage for a reader who treats the book as a
reference work, since it enables each article to stand alone. However, the
fact that this is not a typical handbook (as authors admit in the
introduction) places it between two chairs: on the one hand, case study-based
articles may be too in-depth for a reader from outside the discipline; on the
other, introductions covering the same issues may get repetitive for a CMC
scholar reading the volume from cover to cover.

That said, many contributions succeed in achieving a perfect balance of
original research and an overview of theory. For instance, the chapter on
blogging by Cornelius Puschmann provides a comprehensive collection of
references on every issue connected with blogging and a graphic representation
of the existing research in the area by field, methodology, research questions
and ‘implicit conceptualization’ (p. 86) – both of which would be invaluable
to a reader seeking introduction to the subject matter. At the same time, in
the remainder of the chapter Puschmann offers an insightful account of the
pragmalinguistic dimension of blogs, illustrating his points about deixis,
audience design and addressivity with help of two blog posts.

Organisation of articles by thematic blocks allowed the editors to make
visible the trends and generalities that appeared again and again in
contributions by different authors. For instance, all conversation analytic
chapters emphasized the importance of looking at the process of turn
construction, e.g. by video recording of the participants typing their turns.
Also interesting in this regard are the different transcription solutions
reflecting the multimodal data.

Concerning the technological modes dealt with in the volume, the net has been
cast so wide that mobile phone outputs (Ch. 7 and 8) have also been included.
This reflects the growing concern in the field that the classic term
Computer-Mediated Communication may be too restrictive and should give way to
a more inclusive one such as, possibly, Digital Media Communication or
Networked Communication (see e.g. recent discussion on the Association of
Internet Researchers mailing list, “CMC – mobile phones included?”). It is
regrettable that while the established genres of email or chat received a lot
of attention across the sections, newer modes such as microblogging and social
networks did not make an appearance. The editors remark that “significant
bodies of language-focused research have yet to accumulate” on these topics
(p. 5). However, both Twitter and Facebook have attracted a lot of scholarly
attention in the last years (Androutsopoulos 2013, Bolander and Locher 2010,
Zappavigna 2012), and their omission is quite noticeable.

Several issues are raised by authors throughout the book: the existing
imbalance towards research on public domain CMC and in English language, as
well as the danger of mindlessly transferring offline frameworks onto online
data. These can be considered as guidelines for further work in this new,
dynamic field, a snapshot of which is portrayed in this book. On the whole,
the volume offers a broad and interesting sample of CMC research and would be
of interest to advanced students and researchers alike.

REFERENCES

Androutsopoulos, Jannis. 2013. Networked multilingualism: Some language
practices on Facebook and their implications. International Journal of
Bilingualism prepublished 11 June 2013. 1-21.

AoIR Mailing List. CMC – mobile phones included?
http://listserv.aoir.org/pipermail/air-l-aoir.org/2013-July/ Accessed on 16
July 2013.

Bolander, Brook & Miriam Locher. 2010. Constructing identity on Facebook:
report on a pilot study. In: Junod, Karen and Didier Maillat (eds.),
Performing the Self. Tübingen: Narr. 165-187.

Brown, Penelope and Stephen Levinson. 1987. Politeness: Some universals in
language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Crystal, David. 2001. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.

Herring, Susan. 2004. Computer-mediated discourse analysis: An approach to
researching online behaviour. In: Barab, Sasha, Rob Kling and James Gray
(eds.), Designing for Virtual Communities in the Service of Learning. New
York: Cambridge UP. 338-376.

Koch, Peter and Wulf Oesterreicher. 1985. Sprache der Nähe – Sprache der
Distanz. Mündlichkeit und Schriftlichkeit im Spannungsfeld von Sprachtheorie
und Sprachgeschichte In: Daniel Jacob et al. (eds.), Romanistisches Jahrbuch
36. Berlin: DeGruyter. 15-43.

Tagg, Caroline. 2012. Discourse of Text Messaging: Analysis of SMS
Communication. London: Continuum.

Zappavigna, Michele. 2012. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media. London:
Continuum.


ABOUT THE REVIEWER

Daria Dayter received her first degree from the Russian Christian Academy for
the Humanities, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, and her M.A. from the University of
Bayreuth, Germany. She is a research assistant in the English Linguistics
department, University of Bayreuth, Germany. At the moment she is working on a
PhD project on self-praise and indirect complaints in microblogging. Her
research interests include language in the internet, computer-mediated
communication, youth language, and politeness theory.








----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-24-2982	
----------------------------------------------------------



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list