25.3676, Calls: Semantics; Syntax/ Canadian Journal of Linguistics (Jrnl)

The LINGUIST List linguist at linguistlist.org
Fri Sep 19 20:12:16 UTC 2014


LINGUIST List: Vol-25-3676. Fri Sep 19 2014. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 25.3676, Calls: Semantics; Syntax/ Canadian Journal of Linguistics (Jrnl)

Moderators: Damir Cavar, Indiana U <damir at linguistlist.org>
            Malgorzata E. Cavar, Indiana U <gosia at linguistlist.org>

Reviews: reviews at linguistlist.org
Anthony Aristar <aristar at linguistlist.org>
Helen Aristar-Dry <hdry at linguistlist.org>
Sara Couture, Indiana U <sara at linguistlist.org>

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

Do you want to donate to LINGUIST without spending an extra penny? Bookmark
the Amazon link for your country below; then use it whenever you buy from
Amazon!

USA: http://www.amazon.com/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlist-20
Britain: http://www.amazon.co.uk/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlist-21
Germany: http://www.amazon.de/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlistd-21
Japan: http://www.amazon.co.jp/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlist-22
Canada: http://www.amazon.ca/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlistc-20
France: http://www.amazon.fr/?_encoding=UTF8&tag=linguistlistf-21

For more information on the LINGUIST Amazon store please visit our
FAQ at http://linguistlist.org/amazon-faq.cfm.

Editor for this issue: Andrew Lamont <alamont at linguistlist.org>
================================================================  


Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 16:11:58
From: Carrie Gillon [Carrie.Gillon at asu.edu]
Subject: Semantics; Syntax/ Canadian Journal of Linguistics (Jrnl)

E-mail this message to a friend:
http://linguistlist.org/issues/emailmessage/verification.cfm?iss=25-3676.html&submissionid=35959917&topicid=3&msgnumber=1
 
Full Title: Canadian Journal of Linguistics 


Linguistic Field(s): Semantics; Syntax 

Call Deadline: 01-Nov-2014 

Extended Call (note new deadline):
As an extension of the DP workshop (Got D?), we propose a special journal
edition of CJL on the functional projection D. In particular, we are
interested in the universality of D. Is D always necessary (e.g. for
argumenthood; Higginbotham 1985; Longobardi 1994, 2000)? Or can a language
lack D altogether (Bošković 2010, 2009, 2008; Chierchia 1998; Bošković &
Gajewski 2011; Despic 2011)? Or is an intermediate position possible? What
features of D are universal (if any; Matthewson 1998; Gillon 2013)? Is
definiteness required for the presence of D? Are there different kinds of
definiteness (e.g. Frisian determiners)? Can D be a marker of specificity
instead of definiteness (as in Samoan; Mosel & Hovdhaugen 1992)?

We are soliciting papers on the topic of D, especially whether D is universal
or not, and how we can tell. We are particularly interested in the following
questions: What are the consequences of lack/presence of a covert D? How, if
at all, does D relate to other functors in a language? How, if at all, does
the semantic content of D bear on the interpretations of bare nouns? What
predictions does the lack/presence of a covert D make? If a D is indeed
lacking, how to account for the definiteness effects? What is the difference
between a null definiteness operator and a covert D? Why do the data
interpretations from articleless languages pattern differently? 

This will be competitive: only the top 6-8 papers will be selected. Please
send papers to solveiga.armoskaite at rochester.edu or carrie.gillon at asu.edu by
November 1, 2014







----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-25-3676	
----------------------------------------------------------




    



More information about the LINGUIST mailing list