27.3997, Confs: Gen Ling, Ling Theories, Syntax/Belgium

Fri Oct 7 18:36:49 UTC 2016

LINGUIST List: Vol-27-3997. Fri Oct 07 2016. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 27.3997, Confs: Gen Ling, Ling Theories, Syntax/Belgium

Moderators: linguist at linguistlist.org (Damir Cavar, Malgorzata E. Cavar)
Reviews: reviews at linguistlist.org (Anthony Aristar, Helen Aristar-Dry,
                                   Robert Coté, Michael Czerniakowski)
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

*****************    LINGUIST List Support    *****************
                       Fund Drive 2016
                   25 years of LINGUIST List!
Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
           http://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/

Editor for this issue: Kenneth Steimel <ken at linguistlist.org>
================================================================

Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2016 14:36:17
From: Jeroen van Craenenbroeck [jeroen.vancraenenbroeck at kuleuven.be]
Subject: 9th Brussels Conference on Generative Linguistics

9th Brussels Conference on Generative Linguistics 
Short Title: BCGL 9 

Date: 13-Dec-2016 - 14-Dec-2016 
Location: Brussels, Belgium 
Contact: Will Harwood 
Contact Email: bcgl9 at crissp.be 
Meeting URL: http://www.crissp.be/bcgl9 

Linguistic Field(s): General Linguistics; Linguistic Theories; Syntax 

Meeting Description: 

Throughout the history of generative grammar, there have been various ways of
implementing locality effects, for example through Transformational Cycles
(Chomsky 1965; Kayne 1969) or Barriers (Chomsky 1986). Phase Theory
(Uriagereka 1999; Chomsky 2000, 2001) constitutes the most recent development
in this line of thinking. It is often argued that there exist discrete
structural domains in natural language that exhibit a degree of syntactic,
semantic, and phonological independence from their surrounding linguistic
environment. Phase Theory offers a tool for understanding such domains.
However, since the inception of phases, there have been many different
proposals about the specific formalization of this concept, along with much
debate about the extent to which phases can be evidenced empirically (and
indeed whether phases exist at all). The aim of this workshop is to discuss
the empirical validity and theoretical specifics of Phase Theory. The
questions and issues this workshop aims to address, include, but are not
limited to the following:

1. What are the empirical diagnostics for phases and how reliable are these?
Common diagnostics for phases are:

- (related to the narrow syntax) successive-cyclic movement (islands),
agreement, binding conditions, quantifier scope, and parasitic gaps (Fox 1998;
Nissenbaum 1998; Legate 2003);
- (related to the PF-interface) ellipsis (Holmberg 1999, 2001; Gengel 2007,
2008), and prosodic rule application (Sato 2009);
- (related to the LF-interface) idiomatic expressions (Svenonius 2005; Harwood
& Temmerman 2015; Kim 2015).

2. What is the definition of a phase? Do phases correspond to sub-numerations
(Chomsky 2000, 2001), spell-out domains and/or workspaces (Uriagereka 1999)?
Or do they need to be defined in terms of e.g. Prolific Domains (Grohmann
2003), Layered Derivations (Zwart 2009), or Cyclic Linearization (Fox &
Pesetsky 2003, 2005)? Related questions are: What is the timing of spell-out
and what exactly is spelled out (Chomsky 2000, 2001; Fox & Pesetsky 2003,
2005; Richards 2011; Bošković 2014)?

3. What does the inventory of phases look like: CP, vP, DP, PP, ...? Is the
size of a phase fixed? Are phases rigid and absolute or context-sensitive (cf.
Bošković (2013, 2014), Wurmbrand (2013) and Harwood (2015) for dynamic phases,
Den Dikken (2007) for phase extension, and Gallego (2010) for phase sliding)?

4. To what extent do phases at one interface (necessarily) coincide with
phases at another interface (Marušič 2005; d'Alessandro & Scheer 2015)?

CRISSP is proud to present the ninth installment of the Brussels Conference on
Generative Linguistics (BCGL), devoted to Phase Theory. We are pleased to
announce that the following invited speakers have agreed to give a talk at
BCGL 9:

- Željko Bošković (UConn)
- Julie Anne Legate (UPenn)
- Gereon Müller (University of Leipzig)

BCGL 9 will be followed by CRISSP 10, a one-day workshop celebrating the 10th
anniversary of the research institute CRISSP featuring invited presentations
by Luigi Rizzi, Alec Marantz, and Angelika Kratzer, among others. For more
details, please visit www.crissp.be/10.

Conference Location:

CRISSP - KU Leuven Brussels Campus
Warmoesberg 26
1000 Brussels
Belgium

Conference Organizers:

Jeroen van Craenenbroeck
Will Harwood
Dany Jaspers
Cora Pots
Koen Roelandt
Jolijn Sonnaert
Tanja Temmerman
Guido Vanden Wyngaerd

Program:

Tuesday December 13, 2016 - Room 6303

9:00-9:30:
Registration    

9:30-10:30:
Invited speaker: Gereon Mülller   
TBA

10:30-11:00: Coffee Break    

11:00-11:40: 
Coppe van Urk   
On the distribution of reflexes of successive cyclicity across phases

11:40-12:20:
Dmitry Ganenkov   
On the inventory of phase heads: Lezgian repetitive in do-support

12:20-14:20: Lunch Break    

14:20-15:00:
Caterina Donati & Chris Reintges
Diagnosing phase boundaries in participial relative clauses

15:00-15:40:
Norio Nasu &  Keisuke Yoshimoto
The Completeness of Clausal Structure as a Condition on Phasehood

15:40-16:00: Coffee Break    

16:00-16:40:
Andrew Simpson & Sauron Syed
The complex phasal architecture of nominal constituents

16:40-17:40:
Invited speaker: Julie Anne Legate
TBA

Wednesday December 14, 2016 - Room 6303

9:30-10:10:
Barbara Citko
On Top but not a Phase: Phasehood Inheritance and Variation in Sluicing

10:10-10:50:
Valentina Colasanti & Giusi Silvestri
(Beyond) Force, Mood and Modality: matrix complementisers in Italian dialects

10:50-11:10: Coffee Break    

11:10-11:50:
Carlo Cecchetto & Caterina Donati
Strong Islands and Cyclic Transfer

11:50-12:30:
Neda Todorović
Aspect interacts with phasehood: evidence from Serbian VP-ellipsis

12:30-14:30: Lunch break    

14:30-15:10:
June Abe
Late Merge and Phase Theory

15:10-15:50:
Ivona Kučerová
Spell-Out vs Transfer: Evidence from agreement

15:50-16:10: Coffee Break    

16:10-17:10:
Invited speaker: Željko Bošković
TBA

Alternate:
Marwan Jarrah
T-Φ parameter and agreeing complementizers in Jordanian Arabic

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*****************    LINGUIST List Support    *****************
                       Fund Drive 2016
Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
            http://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/

        Thank you very much for your support of LINGUIST!

----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-27-3997	
----------------------------------------------------------
Visit LL's Multitree project for over 1000 trees dynamically generated
from scholarly hypotheses about language relationships:
          http://multitree.org/