29.1309, Calls: Applied Linguistics, Discourse Analysis, Pragmatics, Sociolinguistics, Text/Corpus Linguistics, Translation / AILA Review (Jrnl)

[The LINGUIST List]

LINGUIST List: Vol-29-1309. Mon Mar 26 2018. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 29.1309, Calls: Applied Linguistics, Discourse Analysis, Pragmatics, Sociolinguistics, Text/Corpus Linguistics, Translation / AILA Review (Jrnl)

Moderators: linguist at linguistlist.org (Damir Cavar, Malgorzata E. Cavar)
Reviews: reviews at linguistlist.org (Helen Aristar-Dry, Robert Coté,
                                   Michael Czerniakowski)
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
           http://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/

Editor for this issue: Sarah Robinson <srobinson at linguistlist.org>
================================================================


Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 11:39:23
From: Daniel Perrin [daniel.perrin at zhaw.ch]
Subject: Applied Linguistics, Discourse Analysis, Pragmatics, Sociolinguistics, Text/Corpus Linguistics, Translation / AILA Review (Jrnl)

 
Full Title: AILA Review 


Linguistic Field(s): Applied Linguistics; Discourse Analysis; Pragmatics; Sociolinguistics; Text/Corpus Linguistics; Translation 

Call Deadline: 01-Jun-2019 

Linguistic recycling: The process of quoting in increasingly mediatized
settings
Editors: Lauri Haapanen, University of Jyväskylä, & Daniel Perrin, Zurich
University of Applied Sciences

PDF-Version of the call:
http://www.danielperrin.net/portrait/Bio_files/CfP_quoting.pdf
The 2020 Issue of AILA Review will focus on practices of quoting. By quoting,
we understand the discursive and translingual process of embedding extracts of
formerly produced communicational offers in new, emerging communicational
offers (Haapanen&Perrin, forth.), be it within or across domains and
mediatized institutional settings.
Given its wide range of functions, the situated activity of quoting influences
and is influenced by social structures from micro to macro levels and their
interplay in human interaction. Thus, quoting and its linguistic result, the
quotes, can be seen as rich points in the multimodal construction of society.

In practical terms, the analyses provided by the articles in this volume are
meant to shed light on the interplay of domains, settings, and genres in,
e.g., journalism and editorial conferences; law and court interrogations;
politics and campaigning; academia and review processes; interpreting and
doctor-patient-interaction.
We welcome original articles based on empirically-grounded analyses that focus
on the (i) forms, (ii) functions, and/or (iii) processes of quoting in
increasingly mediatized discourse and complex, dynamic contexts. By doing so,
we expect the contributions to provide data-based answers to linguistically
relevant questions such as:
i) What are the domain-specific conventions, forms, and characteristics to
distinguish quoted language from its surrounding text? 
ii) With what aim do language users attribute their words to someone else and
alternate between various functions and their marking conventions, e.g.,
between direct [D] and indirect quoting [ID] in forensic interviews (Example
1)? 

Ex. 1 (ID) Leif is asked how he knew that the company was for sale and (D)
says ''I know him.'' Data from Byrman 2017
iii) How and why does the process of quoting unfold throughout intertextual
chains in institutional and public discourse, across language users,
workplaces, organizations, and domains? In particular, we welcome papers that
include analyses of the metadiscourse of quoting - discourse about the process
of embedding others' language. Practitioners' concurrent or retrospective
verbalizations of their quoting practices (as in Example 2, from journalism)
can significantly add to our understanding of why quoting happens the way it
does.

Ex. 2 A journalist commenting on her own quoting in a cue-based retrospective
verbal protocol: ''I was kind of stunned myself when I realized that these
[quotes] have been edited this much.'' (Data from Haapanen 2017)

Finally, a majority of the contributions to the special issue are meant to
explain changes in quoting practices related to contextual changes such the
fast development of social media as well as increasing mobility, which can be
regarded as global drivers of language recycling (Haapanen&Perrin 2018;
Johansson forth.; Matsushita 2015; Puschmann 2015.)

As a result, the 2020 AILA Review is meant to offer a systematic and
multiperspective approach to a linguistic rich point: the omni-present and
increasingly mediatized practice of recycling (and up-cycling) language across
micro shifts of contextual change.




------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*****************    LINGUIST List Support    *****************
Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
            http://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
 


----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-29-1309	
----------------------------------------------------------