29.4195, Calls: Discourse Analysis, Pragmatics, Sociolinguistics / Studii de lingvistica (Jrnl)

The LINGUIST List linguist at listserv.linguistlist.org
Mon Oct 29 16:05:47 UTC 2018


LINGUIST List: Vol-29-4195. Mon Oct 29 2018. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 29.4195, Calls:  Discourse Analysis, Pragmatics, Sociolinguistics / Studii de lingvistica (Jrnl)

Moderator: linguist at linguistlist.org (Malgorzata E. Cavar)
Reviews: reviews at linguistlist.org (Helen Aristar-Dry, Robert Coté)
Homepage: https://linguistlist.org

Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
           https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/

Editor for this issue: Sarah Robinson <srobinson at linguistlist.org>
================================================================


Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 12:05:42
From: Daciana Vlad [dacianavlad at yahoo.fr]
Subject: Discourse Analysis, Pragmatics, Sociolinguistics / Studii de lingvistica (Jrnl)

 
Full Title: Studii de lingvistica 


Linguistic Field(s): Discourse Analysis; Pragmatics; Sociolinguistics 

Language Family(ies): Romance 

Call Deadline: 20-Nov-2018 

Journal Studii de lingvistică, issue 9/2019
Coordinator: Cristina Petraş

Metadiscursive Expressions in Romance Languages: Syntactic, Pragmatic and
Sociolinguistic Aspects

Natural languages possess the instruments that allow the speaker to talk about
the discourse itself. The speaker can return to the form of this discourse,
mark a possible inadequacy between form and meaning, introduce comments on
this form, etc. Concepts such as (shown) enunciative heterogeneity, autonymous
connotation / modalization and, more broadly, representation of the other's
discourse, proposed by Authier-Revuz (1984, 1995, 2002, 2004), relate to it.
All these metadiscursive operations leave traces in discourse in the form of
what Vincent and Martel (2001: 142) call metadiscursive expressions.

Many studies have been devoted to the analysis of these markers in French,
either studies on a specific marker (faut dire (Pusch 2007), j'allais dire
(Lansari 2017), etc.) or work devoted to a whole category of markers, such as
marqueurs de glose / reformulation (Le Bot et al. 2008).

Research has also been conducted on the emergence of metadiscursive markers
from lexemes likely to form their core, such as dire (see issue 186 of Langue
française).
The identification and the classification of these markers were made according
to several axes: semiotic, syntactic, pragmatic and diachronic.

Researchers also looked at the pragmatic operations performed by these
markers. As regards the marqueurs de glose, Steuckardt (2006) identified
pragmatic operations such as ''indication de dénomination'', ''indication de
signifié'', ''nouvelle nomination'', ''indication d'un exemplaire
remarquable''.

Of different natures (rarely lexemes, most often phrasemes), in idiomatic or
parenthetical constructions, metadiscursive markers also raise questions about
the mechanisms of their emergence: grammaticalization / pragmaticalization,
cooptation (Heine 2013), lexicalization. Vincent and Martel (2001) consider
metadiscursive expressions according to their degree of grammaticalization and
distinguish ''metadiscursive comments'' - the least grammaticalized - from
more or even strongly grammaticalized forms that come to play the role of
discourse markers or particles.

Issue 9 of the journal Studii de lingvistică aims to examine the different
aspects that surround the emergence and the use of metadiscursive expressions,
in French and other Romance languages. The articles should be related to one
of the following axes:
- identification and description of classes of metadiscursive markers
- description of the different syntactic configurations of the markers
- degrees of grammaticalization / pragmaticalization and degrees of
idiomaticity
- types of metadiscursive operations carried out by the markers under study
- metadiscursive expressions and forms of dialogism
- metadiscursive expressions and types of discourse
- diachronic approach
- metadiscursive expressions and variation (situational, regional, social)
- contrastive approach in the field of Romance languages

Abstracts in French or English of about two pages, specifying your corpus and
the methodology used, accompanied by bibliographic references and 5 keywords
and indicating your affiliation should be sent to
studiidelingvistica at gmail.com and petrasac at yahoo.com by 20/11/2018.

Indexing: Web of Science (ESCI), SCOPUS, ERIH PLUS, EBSCO, ProQuest, DOAJ.
Full version of the call for papers:
http://studiidelingvistica.uoradea.ro/index-en.html




------------------------------------------------------------------------------

*****************    LINGUIST List Support    *****************
Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:

              The IU Foundation Crowd Funding site:
       https://iufoundation.fundly.com/the-linguist-list

               The LINGUIST List FundDrive Page:
            https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
 


----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-29-4195	
----------------------------------------------------------






More information about the LINGUIST mailing list