30.1754, Disc: Review of 'Essays on Linguistic Realism'

The LINGUIST List linguist at listserv.linguistlist.org
Wed Apr 24 03:47:02 UTC 2019


LINGUIST List: Vol-30-1754. Tue Apr 23 2019. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 30.1754, Disc: Review of 'Essays on Linguistic Realism'

Moderator: Malgorzata E. Cavar (linguist at linguistlist.org)
Student Moderator: Jeremy Coburn
Managing Editor: Becca Morris
Team: Helen Aristar-Dry, Everett Green, Sarah Robinson, Peace Han, Nils Hjortnaes, Yiwen Zhang, Julian Dietrich
Jobs: jobs at linguistlist.org | Conferences: callconf at linguistlist.org | Pubs: pubs at linguistlist.org

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

**************************************    LINGUIST List Support    **************************************
                                              Fund Drive 2019
                          29 years of LINGUIST List! The annual Fund Drive is on!
Please support the LINGUIST List to ensure we can continue to deliver important information to your mailbox.
                                           Every amount counts:
                                https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/

Editor for this issue: Everett Green <everett at linguistlist.org>
================================================================


Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 23:46:32
From: Hans-Heinrich Lieb [lieb at zedat.fu-berlin.de]
Subject: Review of 'Essays on Linguistic Realism'

 
Read Review: http://linguistlist.org/issues/30/30-1644.html 

A note to the reviewer: A very decent review of the book. As for Lieb's
contribution: a pity the main body of the contribution has not been
discussed,it presents it's own version of linguistic realism. As for
definitions of ''abstract'' and ''concrete'': ''abstract'' is defined as
''non-concrete'' but there has been a change in the definition of ''concrete''
from Lieb (1992): ''concrete'' now means: belonging to SPECIFIC sorts on the
zero-level, which are simply objects in space and time and events in space and
time, and, possibly, mental states and events - that's all. So there is
definitional clarity. It follows that any other sort on the zero-Level is
abstract. A definition of ''abstract'' independently of ''concrete'' is not
attempted.



Linguistic Field(s): Linguistic Theories



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

***************************    LINGUIST List Support    ***************************
 The 2019 Fund Drive is under way! Please visit https://funddrive.linguistlist.org
  to find out how to donate and check how your university, country or discipline
     ranks in the fund drive challenges. Or go directly to the donation site:
               https://iufoundation.fundly.com/the-linguist-list-2019

                        Let's make this a short fund drive!
                Please feel free to share the link to our campaign:
                    https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
 


----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-30-1754	
----------------------------------------------------------






More information about the LINGUIST mailing list