30.4958, Confs: Gen Ling, Historical Ling, Semantics, Syntax/Germany

Wed Jan 1 01:54:01 UTC 2020

LINGUIST List: Vol-30-4958. Tue Dec 31 2019. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 30.4958, Confs: Gen Ling, Historical Ling, Semantics, Syntax/Germany

Moderator: Malgorzata E. Cavar (linguist at linguistlist.org)
Student Moderator: Jeremy Coburn
Managing Editor: Becca Morris
Team: Helen Aristar-Dry, Everett Green, Sarah Robinson, Peace Han, Nils Hjortnaes, Yiwen Zhang, Julian Dietrich
Jobs: jobs at linguistlist.org | Conferences: callconf at linguistlist.org | Pubs: pubs at linguistlist.org

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
           https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/

Editor for this issue: Everett Green <everett at linguistlist.org>
================================================================

Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2019 20:53:45
From: Lukasz Jedrzejowski [l.jedrzejowski at uni-koeln.de]
Subject: Non-Interrogative Subordinate Wh-Clauses

Non-Interrogative Subordinate Wh-Clauses 

Date: 07-Feb-2020 - 08-Feb-2020 
Location: Cologne, Germany 
Contact: Lukasz Jedrzejowski 
Contact Email: adverbial-clauses at uni-koeln.de 
Meeting URL: http://www.lukasz-jedrzejowski.eu/organizing/workshop-on-non-interrogative-subordinate-wh-clauses/ 

Linguistic Field(s): General Linguistics; Historical Linguistics; Semantics; Syntax 

Meeting Description: 

Subordinate clauses introduced by a wh-phrase are embeddable under particular
clause-embedding predicates and are usually analyzed as interrogatives. The
wh-phrases heading such clauses trigger sets of alternatives of the type
determined by the lexical meaning of the wh-words - individuals, places,
times, etc. There are, however, subordinate wh‑clauses in which the
interpretation of the wh-words seems to deviate from their standard lexical
meaning. These wh-clauses will be in the focus of the workshop.

Two cases in question are the use of ''how''-like words instead of declarative
complementizers and non-interrogative ''when''-clauses. The example in (1) is
from Legate (2010) showing that in (colloquial) English ''how'' can be used to
embed clauses that are clearly declarative instead of interrogative. Legate
argues that ''how'' in such clauses must be base-generated in its surface
position. Similarly, there are in German complement clauses headed by ''wie''
'how' that are not interrogative and instead express events in progress, cf.
Umbach et al. (submitted). This type of non-interrogative usage of
''how''-clauses is attested in a number of languages including, e.g., French,
Greek and Hebrew, raising the question of whether manner wh-words are
polysemous across languages, and if not, why manner wh-words may introduce
clauses denoting facts or events.

(1) They told me how the tooth fairy doesn't really exist.

In the example in (2), taken from Hall & Caponigro (2010), the ''when''-clause
occurs in the matrix object position and exhibits a non-interrogative
interpretation which is ambiguous between denoting time intervals and events.
Hall & Caponigro analyze it as a free relative clause. But unlike the analysis
proposed for non-interrogative ''how''-clauses ''when'' is moved from a lower
position.

(2) I hated when Bill left.  

While recent studies provide a deeper understanding of interrogative embedding
(cf. Uegaki 2015, Theiler et al. 2019, Mayr 2019), it remains to be
investigated under what circumstances non-interrogative subordinate wh‑clauses
are licensed and why some wh‑phrases can be polyfunctional, while others are
restricted to their literal meaning. Furthermore, such wh-clauses raise a
number of questions for the cross-linguistic wh‑hierarchy proposed by Šimík
(2011) and the formation of subordinate wh‑clauses in general.

In this workshop we would like to address syntactic as well as semantic issues
relating to non-interrogative subordinate wh-clauses, including (but not
limited to) cross-linguistic patterns and diachronic case studies. We also
welcome contributions from the perspective of non-canonical questions (see,
e.g., workshop on non-canonical questions in Konstanz in Nov. 2019) pertaining
to non-interrogative subordination.

Invited speakers (all confirmed): 

Sebastian Bücking, Universität Tübingen
Ivano Caponigro, University of California San Diego
Alte Grønn, University of Oslo
Roland Hinterhölzl, Ca' Foscari University of Venice
Stefan Hinterwimmer, Universität Wuppertal
Kristina Liefke, Goethe University Frankfurt
Keir Moulton, University of Toronto
Andreas Pankau, Freie Universität Berlin
Lucia M. Tovena, Paris Diderot University
Radek Šimík, Charles University in Prague

The workshop is organized by Łukasz Jędrzejowski (University of Cologne) and
Carla Umbach (ZAS, Berlin, University of Cologne), and funded by a Daimler and
Benz Foundation grant to the first organizer (grant number 32-06/18).

Program:

February 7 (Friday)

9:15-9:30: 
Łukasz Jędrzejowski (University of Cologne) & Carla Umbach (Leibniz‑ZAS,
Berlin & University of Cologne): Introduction

9:30-10:30: 
Norbert Corver (University of Utrecht): Dutch non-interrogative 'hoe': Its
manners of behavior

10:40-11:40: 
Roland Hinterhölzl (Ca' Foscari University of Venice): Verbs of perception and
their (non-)canonical complements

11:40-12:40: 
Andreas Pankau (Free University of Berlin): German relative clauses introduced
by 'wie'

14:30-15:30: 
Atle Grønn (University of Oslo): Embedded 'how'- and 'that'-clauses under
perception verbs. A view from Russian 

15:30-16:30: 
Lucia M. Tovena (Paris Diderot University): Asking about reasons

16:40-17:40: 
Kristina Liefke (Goethe University Frankfurt): Gerundial, finite 'that'-, and
declarative 'how'-complements in experiential attitude reports

February 8 (Saturday)

9:00-10:00: 
Ivano Caponigro (University of California San Diego): 'Wh'-words in varieties
of free relative clauses: Insights from Mesoamerican languages

10:20-11:20: 
Radek Šimìk (Charles University in Prague): A compositional semantics for
relative 'wh'-words

11:20-12:20: 
Richard Faure (University of Côte d'Azur): Classical Greek embedded questions
or when relative clauses cross the border

14:00-15:00: 
Sebastian Bücking (University of Tübingen): 'Wh'-clauses and ontology: The
case of locative 'wh'-clauses in German

15:00-16:00: 
Keir Moulton (University of Toronto): Non-locative 'where'-relatives in a
variety of English (joint work with Marisa Brook, University of Toronto)

16:20-17:20: 
Shinya Okano, Katsumasa Ito, Noritsugu Hayashi & Yoshiki Mori (The University
of Tokyo): On seemingly non‑selected, indirectly quoted embedded questions in
Japanese

17:20-18:20: 
Werner Frey (Leibniz-ZAS, Berlin) & Karin Pittner (University of Bochum):
Empty positions, open questions - Report and comment clauses with 'wie'/'as'

18:20-18:30: 
Łukasz Jędrzejowski (University of Cologne) & Carla Umbach (Leibniz‑ZAS,
Berlin & University of Cologne): Concluding remarks

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

***************************    LINGUIST List Support    ***************************
 The 2019 Fund Drive is under way! Please visit https://funddrive.linguistlist.org
  to find out how to donate and check how your university, country or discipline
     ranks in the fund drive challenges. Or go directly to the donation site:
               https://iufoundation.fundly.com/the-linguist-list-2019

                        Let's make this a short fund drive!
                Please feel free to share the link to our campaign:
                    https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/

----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-30-4958	
----------------------------------------------------------