32.1616, Review: English; Forensic Linguistics; Phonetics; Phonology; Sociolinguistics: Setter (2020)

The LINGUIST List linguist at listserv.linguistlist.org
Mon May 10 19:51:29 UTC 2021


LINGUIST List: Vol-32-1616. Mon May 10 2021. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 32.1616, Review: English; Forensic Linguistics; Phonetics; Phonology; Sociolinguistics: Setter (2020)

Moderator: Malgorzata E. Cavar (linguist at linguistlist.org)
Student Moderator: Jeremy Coburn, Lauren Perkins
Managing Editor: Becca Morris
Team: Helen Aristar-Dry, Everett Green, Sarah Robinson, Nils Hjortnaes, Joshua Sims, Billy Dickson
Jobs: jobs at linguistlist.org | Conferences: callconf at linguistlist.org | Pubs: pubs at linguistlist.org

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
           https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/

Editor for this issue: Jeremy Coburn <jecoburn at linguistlist.org>
================================================================


Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 15:50:51
From: Carolina Gonzalez [cgonzalez3 at fsu.edu]
Subject: Your Voice Speaks Volumes

 
Discuss this message:
http://linguistlist.org/pubs/reviews/get-review.cfm?subid=36640657


Book announced at http://linguistlist.org/issues/31/31-394.html

AUTHOR: Jane  Setter
TITLE: Your Voice Speaks Volumes
SUBTITLE: It's Not What You Say, But How You Say It
PUBLISHER: Oxford University Press
YEAR: 2020

REVIEWER: Carolina Gonzalez, Florida State University

SUMMARY

‘Your Voice Speaks Volumes: It’s not what you say, but how you say’ considers
the connection of our voices to our identity and to how we perceive others
(and ourselves). The book is divided into seven chapters. In the first
chapter, ‘The nuts and bolts; how speech works’, Setter defines her use of
‘voice’ as ‘a cover term for the way that people produce speech and how that
sounds’ (p. 4). This chapter previews the main goals of the book, and provides
a concise introduction to how speech is produced, perceived, and acquired from
the womb. Setter stresses that people can use their voice in a
‘chameleon-like’ manner, and that our voice shows our ‘social allegiances, our
tribal memberships’ (p. 13); this idea is developed further in Chapter 2. This
first chapter also introduces the sounds of English, taking as reference
General British (also known as Received Pronunciation (RP) or BBC English).
This chapter concludes with a brief overview on how the rest of the book is
organized.

Chapter 2, ‘The Watling Street divide: Romans, Anglo-Saxons, Vikings, and
accent prejudice’ addresses accentism, both in terms of the discrimination
suffered by speakers of certain dialects, and of the criticism suffered when
someone modifies (or is perceived to modify) the way they speak. Setter
centers the discussion on accent prejudice by presenting a concise overview of
how UK dialects originated. She shows that the development of distinct accents
in the UK resulted mostly from migratory settlements and invasions from
various linguistic groups over several centuries. While regional accents of
English can be traced to the linguistic influence of the Anglo-Saxons (from
the 5th century) and Vikings (from the 8th century), the origin of prestigious
RP is related to the influence of Norman French in the English spoken by the
ruling classes after the Norman Conquest in the 11th century. In addition,
Setter shows that the presence of various accent traits in English dialects is
connected to the Danelaw, i.e., the geographical area where the Vikings
settled. The chapter concludes by further elaborating the idea that accent is
tribal.

In Chapter 3 ‘Men can’t make their voices sound sexy, and other gems’, Setter
addresses several topics related to voice and gender. Setter first considers
how specific voice traits are connected to physical and personality
characteristics; in particular, the use of low pitch tends to be associated
(at least in English) with larger builds in men, and also with confidence and
authoritativeness for both men and women. A well-known example of this
connection is that of British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, who took voice
lessons to lower her overall pitch and reduce her pitch range in order to be
more successful in politics. Setter devotes a large part of this chapter to
describing in detail the study in Hugues et al. (2014), which investigates the
perception of various attributes (attractiveness, confidence, intelligence,
and dominance) in female and male voices. One of the key points of the study
is that the perception of attractiveness in male and female voices is very
different; female voices modified to sound more attractive are rated
accordingly; but this is not the case for male voices, which are actually
rated as less attractive if modified to sound more so. In the remainder of the
chapter, Setter considers two voice qualities routinely criticized because of
their association with young women: ‘uptalk’ (i.e., the use of final rising
intonation in statements) and ‘vocal fry’ (i.e. ‘creaky voice’), which Setter
defines as very slow vibration of the vocal folds. Although uptalk is used by
both men and women and has been documented in Australian English since the
1950s, and in the US and the UK since the 1970s and 1980’s, respectively
(Warren 2016), it continues to be negatively associated with young women,
particularly in the US. Similarly, creaky voice, particularly in the US, is
primarily (and negatively) associated with young women, even if male speakers
and older women use it as well. Setter concludes her discussion pointing out
that the negative stereotyping of women’s voices is a form of discrimination
and ‘even sexual violence’ (page 85).

In Chapter 4, ‘Gahaad save our Queen! Professional and performance voices and
accents’, Setter writes about the intersection between accent, style, identity
and prejudice in voice professionals. The chapter begins by addressing media
controversies, mostly concerning British singers singing in American accents.
As background to the discussion, this chapter provides a concise account of
some differences in consonant and vowel pronunciation in General American and
General British. Setter interviews several voice professionals for this
chapter, including singers, DJs, accent coaches, and newsreaders and radio
presenters, offering a nuanced account of the complexity involved in choosing
one accent over another in voice performance. While some singers sing in an
accent different from their regular speaking accent, mostly because some
musical genres are closely associated with specific dialects, other singers
choose not to do so since they feel their accent is closely connected with
their identity.  Setter also discusses the thorny issue of regional accents in
broadcasting in the UK, where RP is preferred, and the slow strides made to
hire and retain more female newsreaders and radio presenters because of
accentism and voice gender prejudice. Setter also addresses the need for
actors to learn different accents to enhance their chance of being hired
(and/or to avoid being typecast).

In Chapter 5, ‘Your voice is your witness: forensic speaker analysis in
criminal investigations’, Setter provides a succinct but illuminating account
of how voice analysis can be harnessed for forensic purposes. It discusses how
auditory and acoustic analysis is performed to compare recordings and evaluate
the likelihood that they belong to the same voice. This analysis, usually
conducted by a team of specialists, analyzes both ‘top down’ characteristics,
including fillers, discourse markers, and forms of address, but also
intonation, voice quality (such as creaky or breathy voice), and background
noise. Forensic acoustic analysis also considers ‘bottom up’ (fine detailed)
characteristics, including specific consonant and vowel pronunciations. The
chapter includes a brief discussion of the main characteristics of waveforms
and spectrograms. Other topics covered in this chapter include voice parades
(voice line-ups), speaker profiling, and evidence tampering.

Chapter 6, ‘Making a change: transgender speech and synthesized voices’ begins
by considering how voice is tied to gender perception and identity in the case
of transgender speakers. While male voices tend to average 100-150 Hz., female
voices tend to have a higher pitch, around 200-300 Hz. Biologically,
differences in larynx size account for this difference. More subtle
differences are involved as well, including the ways in which some sounds are
articulated. Transgender people are commonly misgendered by the way their
voice sounds, particularly transfeminine speakers. While female-to-male
transgender people can increase the size of their larynx via testosterone
hormones to achieve a lower average pitch, it is harder for male-to-female
transgender people to decrease the size of their larynx, and thus
transfeminine people tend to be misgendered more often. Setter interviews one
transmasculine and three transfeminine English speakers; the latter report
more frequent misgendering than the former, and also the use of a wider range
of strategies beyond pitch lowering or rising to make their voices better
represent their non-biological gender, including breathiness, and creaky
voice. This chapter also brings up why (most) people appear to dislike their
voices, and provides some additional discussion of the importance of visual
cues and voice recognition, also mentioned in Chapter 3. The second part of
this chapter focuses speech synthesis, in particular its application in
providing a voice to people who cannot produce speech--as was the case for
Stephen Hawking. Setter briefly covers some of the challenges involved in
synthesized speech, including conveying the appropriate intonation in a given
context, and also the need for increased options and more affordability of
synthetic voices that can be a good fit for speakers of diverse genders, ages,
and dialects.

In the final chapter, ‘English voices, global voices’, Setter focuses on the
English spoken in other parts of the world, addressing the aftermath of
colonialism in the development of ‘Old varieties of English’, including North
American, Australian, and New Zealand English, and ‘New varieties of English’,
including Indian and Singapore English. Setter acknowledges the importance of
ethnicity and race in the discussion of voice and accent, and brings to the
discussion some recent controversies reflecting accentism, mostly having to do
with American English. This short chapter is followed by a brief annotated
bibliography for readers interested in learning more about the topics covered
in this book. The book also includes a list of commented further reading, a
list of figures and QR codes, and an epilogue. The companion site provides a
list of the URL links for the QR codes mentioned throughout the book, and
sound files and color waveform/spectrograms, mostly from Chapter 5. 

EVALUATION

Setter’s book provides an enjoyable, informative discussion of the relevance
of our voice for our identity and how we perceive others. Many of the topics
covered are very timely and are not typically covered in introductory sources
to phonetics or linguistics. Setter focuses mostly on British accents, which
she acknowledges could be considered a limitation. However, many or most
topics covered in this book also apply to other dialects of English, and
Setter does address some voice characteristics typically associated with
Australian and/or American accents and points the reader to additional sources
on other dialects throughout the book.

>From the beginning, Setter incorporates in the discussion controversies in the
media and her own life experience, which makes the volume relevant and
engaging. Setter’s ample experience as a phonetician, media commentator,
forensic expert, and musician enriches the discussion and contributes to
making this book highly interdisciplinary. The book is clearly written and
Setter comes across as a highly relatable and approachable author (she even
provides her twitter feed name and invites readers to contact her to further
discuss the book). The volume also includes innovative features, including QR
codes that make some of the audio/video examples she refers to available to
anybody with access to a cell phone. The links to recent websites, videos and
podcasts make the concepts, people and examples in this book come alive and
provide the reader with additional food for thought.

As a non-technical book intended for a general audience, the content and
necessary background covered is more than adequate. As a linguist, however, I
would have loved to see further elaboration on a few topics. For example, in
Chapter 4, Setter points out that women are language innovators and that they
will continue to be criticized for the way they speak, even as their
innovative speech traits become widespread. I would have liked to see a bit
more background on women as linguistic innovators. In addition, in Chapter 5,
Setter introduces the first and second formants (F1 and F2) and mentions that
sometimes the third and fourth formants (F3 and F4) are relevant in forensic
speech analysis. More discussion of the role of higher formants would have
been an excellent addition to the discussion of forensic speech analysis,
particularly as F4 and higher formants in vowels are reported to be closely
associated with the voice quality of individual speakers (Ladefoged & Johnson
2011:214). I would also like to point out two aspects that could be clarified
or expanded upon. In Chapter 4, Setter mentions a phonemic contrast between
the voiced labio-velar approximant /w/ in General American English and its
voiceless counterpart in words spelled with ‘wh’ (p. 90-91). This contrast has
actually been on the decline for decades, and very few American English
speakers maintain it nowadays (Edwards 1992:194-196; Wayland 2019:23).
Finally, in Chapter 3 vocal fry is characterized as very slow vibration of the
vocal folds, but the characterization of this voice quality is more complex
and also tends to involve irregular vibration of the vocal chords (see for
example Esling et al. 2020). 

This book will be mostly relevant for readers interested in language and/or
gender. Because of its focus on practical applications of phonetics and its
discussion of voice discrimination, particularly regarding accentism, gender
differences, and misgendering in transgender speech, it will also be of
interest to instructors and students of introductory courses in general
linguistics, phonetics, and sociolinguistics. I would like to end this review
by referring the interested reader to Setter’s excellent Google talk on her
book, available on YouTube and cited below.

REFERENCES

Edwards, Harold T. 1992. Applied Phonetics: The Sounds of American English.
San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.

Esling, John H., Scott R. Moisik, Allison Benner, and Lise Crevier-Buchman.
2019. Voice quality. The Laryngeal Articulator Model. Cambridge: CUP.

Hugues, Susan M., Justin K. Mogilski, and Marissa A. Harrison. 2014. The
perception and parameters of intentional voice manipulation. Journal of
Nonverbal Behavior 38.1. 107-27.
Ladefoged, Peter & Keith Johnson. 2011. A Course in Phonetics. Boston, MA:
Wadsworth Cengage Learning. 6th ed.

Setter, Jane. 2019. Your Voice Speaks Volumes. Talks at Google.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBFzwQDaVFE

Wayland, Ratree. 2019. Phonetics: A Practical Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.

Warren, Paul. 2016. Uptalk: The Phenomenon of Rising Intonation. Cambridge:
CUP.


ABOUT THE REVIEWER

Carolina Gonzalez is an Associate Professor of Spanish and Linguistics and
coordinator of the Spanish and Portuguese Program at the Department of Modern
Languages and Linguistics at Florida State University. Her research interests
encompass phonetics, phonology, L2 phonological acquisition, the
syntax-phonology interface, and constructed languages.





------------------------------------------------------------------------------

***************************    LINGUIST List Support    ***************************
 The 2020 Fund Drive is under way! Please visit https://funddrive.linguistlist.org
  to find out how to donate and check how your university, country or discipline
     ranks in the fund drive challenges. Or go directly to the donation site:
                   https://crowdfunding.iu.edu/the-linguist-list

                        Let's make this a short fund drive!
                Please feel free to share the link to our campaign:
                    https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
 


----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-32-1616	
----------------------------------------------------------






More information about the LINGUIST mailing list