32.1781, Review: Applied Linguistics: Plonsky (2020)

The LINGUIST List linguist at listserv.linguistlist.org
Fri May 21 16:10:20 UTC 2021


LINGUIST List: Vol-32-1781. Fri May 21 2021. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 32.1781, Review: Applied Linguistics: Plonsky (2020)

Moderator: Malgorzata E. Cavar (linguist at linguistlist.org)
Student Moderator: Jeremy Coburn, Lauren Perkins
Managing Editor: Becca Morris
Team: Helen Aristar-Dry, Everett Green, Sarah Robinson, Nils Hjortnaes, Joshua Sims, Billy Dickson
Jobs: jobs at linguistlist.org | Conferences: callconf at linguistlist.org | Pubs: pubs at linguistlist.org

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
           https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/

Editor for this issue: Jeremy Coburn <jecoburn at linguistlist.org>
================================================================


Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 12:09:50
From: Eric Ku [ericku718 at gmail.com]
Subject: Professional Development in Applied Linguistics

 
Discuss this message:
http://linguistlist.org/pubs/reviews/get-review.cfm?subid=36671637


Book announced at http://linguistlist.org/issues/31/31-2552.html

EDITOR: Luke  Plonsky
TITLE: Professional Development in Applied Linguistics
SUBTITLE: A guide to success for graduate students and early career faculty
PUBLISHER: John Benjamins
YEAR: 2020

REVIEWER: Eric K. Ku, Akita University

SUMMARY

“Professional Development in Applied Linguistics: A guide to success for
graduate students and early career faculty”, edited by Luke Plonsky, is a
compilation of professional advice from scholars in applied linguistics. The
book aims to address the lack of information about how to succeed
professionally in the field of applied linguistics. Many graduate students and
early career faculty members in applied linguistics can get advice on how to
navigate academia through peers, mentors, workshops, or the Internet, but
those sources can vary greatly in accessibility, reliability, and consistency.
Thus, the book aims to gather such information in an easy-to-read handbook and
guide readers through the murky waters of academia. Collectively, the book
covers an impressive breadth of information, including essential stages of
one’s academic career, both personal anecdotes and research data, and a
variety of perspectives from scholars at different institutions and different
stages of their careers. The edited volume is roughly organized into two
parts, with Chapters 1 to 7 more pertinent to graduate students and Chapters 8
to 13 for early career faculty, though the distinction is not explicit. 

Chapter 1, “On the state of professional development in applied linguistics”
by Luke Plonsky, makes a case for the aims and scope of this book (as
addressed in the previous paragraph) and how a reader might approach reading
this book. Plonsky reminds readers that their reactions to the discussions in
this book may change as they progress in their career and that none of the
suggestions should be taken as applicable to all scenarios. 

Chapter 2, “Demistifying the process: Choosing, applying to, and getting
accepted to a doctoral program in Applied linguistics” by Ayşenur Sağdıç and
Daniel R. Isbell, explains in detail the process and dos and don'ts of
entering a doctoral program, referencing personal experience as well as
findings from surveys with PhD students and current faculty members. Sağdıç
and Isbell not only address the logistics of entering a doctoral program
(e.g., writing a statement of purpose, preparing for interviews), but also the
thought processes involved in the many decisions one must make (e.g., reasons
to pursue a PhD, factors to consider in choosing a program).

Chapter 3, “Navigating graduate school and academia: Key questions and answer”
by Alison Mackey, uses a question-and-answer format to address a wide range of
issues that come up when going through a PhD program, including the
advisor-student relationship, academic life, conferences, and publishing. This
chapter is a general overview of what one can expect from academic life as a
graduate student and, as Mackey notes, serves as an introduction to some of
the topics covered in more depth in other chapters. 

Chapter 4, “Making the most of your applied linguistics conference experience:
Things to do before, during and after the event” by Peter I. De Costa, details
the steps one should take to prepare for (before), participate in (during),
and follow up (after) the conference. Although De Costa uses the American
Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL) as his primary example, De Costa’s
advice is generally applicable to other conferences as well. Moreover, the
chapter goes beyond simply restating the advice one often gets, that
“Conferences are important!” or “Go to conferences!”, and shows how one can
benefit the most from attending a conference.

Chapter 5, “Towards achieving work-life balance in academia: Comments and
personal essays from six applied linguistics” by Tov Larsson, Shawn Loewen,
Rhonda Oliver, Miyuki Sasaki, Nicole Tracy-Ventura, and Luke Plonsky, consists
of five personal essays about how each author has approached work-life balance
in academia and how that has impacted their lives. Each of the essays is
written from a different perspective, giving the readers a brief glimpse into
their life histories as academics, though five themes are present among the
essays: handling a flexible schedule, efficiency strategies, boundary-setting,
kids, and sacrifices. 

Chapter 6, “Towards the successful completion of a doctoral dissertation” by
John Bitchener, discusses the key stages of completing a doctoral
dissertation: the pre-enrolment period, the provisional enrolment period, the
confirmation of candidature period, and the submission and viva (oral defense)
period. Though this is written as a guide to approaches doctoral students
should consider in successfully completing a doctoral dissertation, the
chapter can also be relevant to new doctoral supervisors who can benefit from
an overview of what issues students are likely to confront throughout the
entire process.

Chapter 7, “Navigating the academic job market” by Avizia Long, Kristopher
Kyle, and Graham Crookes, guides doctoral students through the specific steps
of successfully preparing for the job market, searching for jobs, and
conducting job interviews. The chapter not only includes perspectives from
both recently hired and senior scholars in the field but also a variety of
additional online resources for more information. 

Chapter 8, “Handling interpersonal and departmental dynamics” by Bryan Smith,
transitions into the second part of the book which focuses on life as an
academic, particularly in navigating the interpersonal dynamics as a new
member of a department faculty. The chapter covers four domains of academic
life: service, teaching, and research, and other aspects of interpersonal and
departmental dynamics. Throughout the chapter, a recurring theme is balancing
being engaged and having one’s voice heard versus putting one’s head down and
showing deference to more senior faculty members.

Chapter 9, “Reviewing manuscripts for academic journals” by Rebecca Sachs,
addresses the benefits and process of reviewing manuscripts for academic
journals. The chapter starts by discussing up front what makes the manuscript
review process unpleasant, namely the amount of time and effort it takes to
write a quality review and the lack of compensation. However, the chapter
makes a case for the benefits of reviewing manuscripts and details specific
guidelines for approaching manuscript reviews.

Chapter 10, “Engaging with professional organizations” by Heidi Byrnes, argues
for the value of contributing to professional organizations by describing her
experience engaging in the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign
Languages (ACTFL) and the American Association of Teachers of German (AATG),
the Northeast Conference on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (NECTFL), the
Modern Language Association (MLA), the College Board, and the American
Association for Applied Linguistics (AAAL). For each of these examples, Byrnes
discusses what real-world issues and projects she was involved with at the
time, and what lessons she learned from them.

Chapter 11, “Supervising doctoral students and managing the
supervisor-supervisee relationship” by Jean-Marc Dewaele, discusses issues
around the supervisor-supervisee relationship from the supervisor perspective.
Through personal experiences from supervising many students over the years,
Dewaele touches upon a variety of topics such as the difference between
supervising an M.A. versus a Ph.D. student, interruptions in students’
studies, how close a supervisor wants to be to the supervisee’s non-academic
life, what students think supervisors expect of them, and developing social
and emotional intelligence.

Chapter 12, “Crossing over: Writing (and talking) for general (as compared to
academic) audiences” by Deborah Tannen, describes the challenges of publishing
writing for both academic audiences and general audiences. Tannen has
extensive personal experience on this topic and shares her thoughts, including
the different ways an academic writer must alter their language when
addressing general audiences, the mutual disdain academics and non-academics
may have for each other, and struggles in the publishing process for
non-academic work.

Chapter 13, “Preparing for tenure & promotion”, by Kimberly Geeslin and Laura
Gurzynski-Weiss, details the steps necessary to prepare for and successfully
obtain tenure. Using a structure somewhat similar to Chapter 7 on navigating
the job market, the authors discuss suggestions for what scholars should be
doing during different stages of tenure, from early on during pre-tenure years
(e.g., documenting one’s accomplishments, thinking  strategically) to the
mid-term review. The chapter contains mentor-mentee notes, three checklists,
and a refreshing dose of humor.     

EVALUATION

This edited volume effectively fills the need it has set out to address; that
is, to provide an accessible professional development resource for graduate
students and early-career faculty members specifically geared towards applied
linguistics. The editors and authors are very aware and up front about the
context in which this book is situated – that much of this information is
already available floating amongst peers, colleagues, advisors, and online
resources, but not collected and curated in one place as an easily accessible
resource. The value of gathering the breadth of advice and information into an
edited handbook is apparent – one can imagine teachers and supervisors
recommending this edited volume to their students or students finding this at
their institution’s library.

In addition to the book’s functional merits as a useful professional
development resource, I also appreciate the diversity of approaches and
writing styles amongst the chapters, a demonstration that there is not just a
single way of doing scholarly writing in applied linguistics. While some
chapters take a more prescriptive, no-nonsense, “here’s what you should do”
approach, usually presented as strategies and dos and don’ts, other chapters
take a more descriptive, narrative, “here’s what my experience was like”
approach, usually presented as snapshots and stories. Even with a vast array
of approaches, the edited volume still comes together as a coherent
collection, consistently sticking to its intended theme and audience.

Personally, I read and reviewed this book from two interconnected
perspectives: (1) as an early-career researcher myself, having received my
doctoral degree within the past year, and (2) as an academic who completed my
doctoral degree from and is currently working at non-mainstream academic
institutions, or “the periphery”, as described by Sasaki in chapter 5). From
my perspective as an early-career researcher, I found myself feeling a mix of
emotions, including regret and recognition of things I should have done during
graduate school that would have benefitted my career, appreciation for
information that applies directly to where I am now in my career, and
empowerment from a sense of what to expect from my career in the near future.
Another way of framing how I felt while reading the book was wishing I had
read the first third of the book as a graduate student, glad to have read the
middle third of the book now as an early career researcher, and planning to
revisit the last third of the book in the near future. 

>From my perspective as an academic in the periphery, I felt conflicted.
Plonsky, the editor, clearly notes in Chapter 1 that there was an effort to
include authors from a variety of cultural perspectives and admits that
multi-national representation was not possible in this volume. On the one
hand, I appreciated being able to read advice from well-known, respected
scholars in our field; access to this kind of information is not always
possible or easily accessible for those studying and working in the periphery.
There is a certain kind of empowerment in having access to “what the experts
know”. On the other hand, it often felt like I was reading about people,
programs, and systems from afar. While I recognize that the editors and
authors have clearly stated that the edited volume is not meant to be
prescriptive or one-size-fits-all, I am eager to read more from perspectives
that are explicitly positioned from the periphery, such as Sasaki in Chapter
5; such as (but not limited to) participating in the international Applied
Linguistics community as a scholar from the periphery, confronting
native-speakerism in the job market (from whatever your language background
is), or competing in the job market as a scholar with degrees from the
periphery. The lack of these perspectives is understandable, considering that
this volume is the first of its kind, and it certainly does not diminish the
value of the advice featured in the current volume. However, expanding future
volumes to include more perspectives from the periphery would certainly widen
the range of readers that would benefit from this as a resource. 

I look forward to more publications that follow the direction this volume has
charted. Perhaps in a second edited volume, other topics that would be
beneficial as professional development in Applied Linguistics includes
navigating academia from non-mainstream perspectives (e.g., scholars with
previous backgrounds in non-academic or non-linguistic fields, LGBTQ+
scholars, scholars from under-resourced areas or institutions), understanding
other facets of the publication landscape (e.g., predatory journals,
publishing in journals vs. chapters vs. monographs), ways of keeping updated
or learning new research methodologies and theories post graduate school, and
other academic wellbeing topics like Chapter 5 (e.g., dealing with imposter
syndrome, procrastination).


ABOUT THE REVIEWER

Eric K. Ku (Ph.D.) is a lecturer at Akita University in Japan. He has
previously taught in Taiwan and the United States. His current research
interests involve language teacher identity, narrative-based research,
multilingualism, and linguistic landscapes. His recent work can be found in
“Critical Discourse Studies”, “English Teaching and Learning”, and the edited
volume, “Autoethnographies in ELT Transnational Identities, Pedagogies, and
Practices.”





------------------------------------------------------------------------------

***************************    LINGUIST List Support    ***************************
 The 2020 Fund Drive is under way! Please visit https://funddrive.linguistlist.org
  to find out how to donate and check how your university, country or discipline
     ranks in the fund drive challenges. Or go directly to the donation site:
                   https://crowdfunding.iu.edu/the-linguist-list

                        Let's make this a short fund drive!
                Please feel free to share the link to our campaign:
                    https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
 


----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-32-1781	
----------------------------------------------------------






More information about the LINGUIST mailing list