33.2491, Calls: Pragmatics/Belgium
The LINGUIST List
linguist at listserv.linguistlist.org
Tue Aug 16 00:11:10 UTC 2022
LINGUIST List: Vol-33-2491. Tue Aug 16 2022. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.
Subject: 33.2491, Calls: Pragmatics/Belgium
Moderator: Malgorzata E. Cavar (linguist at linguistlist.org)
Student Moderator: Billy Dickson
Managing Editor: Lauren Perkins
Team: Helen Aristar-Dry, Everett Green, Sarah Goldfinch, Nils Hjortnaes,
Joshua Sims, Billy Dickson, Amalia Robinson, Matthew Fort
Jobs: jobs at linguistlist.org | Conferences: callconf at linguistlist.org | Pubs: pubs at linguistlist.org
Homepage: http://linguistlist.org
Hosted by Indiana University
Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
Editor for this issue: Everett Green <everett at linguistlist.org>
================================================================
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 00:09:00
From: Elke Diedrichsen [e.diedric at googlemail.com]
Subject: IPrA-Panel: Modelling cultural and contextual influence: Patterns, templates and schemas in utterance interpretation
Full Title: IPrA-Panel: Modelling cultural and contextual influence: Patterns, templates and schemas in utterance interpretation
Date: 09-Jul-2023 - 14-Jul-2023
Location: Brussels, Belgium
Contact Person: Elke Diedrichsen
Meeting Email: e.diedric at googlemail.com
Web Site: https://pragmatics.international/page/CfP
Linguistic Field(s): Pragmatics
Call Deadline: 01-Nov-2022
Meeting Description:
IPrA Conference, Brussels, July 9-14, 2023
https://pragmatics.international/page/CfP
Call for papers for the IPrA-Panel
Modelling cultural and contextual influence: Patterns, templates and schemas
in utterance interpretation
Organisers:
Elke Diedrichsen, Technological University Dublin: e.diedric at googlemail.com
Frank Liedtke, University of Leipzig: liedtke at uni-leipzig.de
Call for Papers:
In communicative situations, interlocutors rely on context in order to
successfully process linguistic utterances. Models of the context dependency
of utterance meaning have been proposed in semantics and pragmatics, including
the notions of frame (Fillmore), relevance (Sperber and Wilson), Austinian
proposition (Récanati), core and emergent common ground (Clark 1996, Kecskes
and Zhang 2009).
For utterance-context integration, interpreters usually rely on standardised
patterns (Carston 2002). Situation-bound utterances as defined by Kecskes
(2010) are highly conventionalized, prefabricated pragmatic units tied to
standardised communicative situations.
Mey (2001, 2010) observes that pragmatic acts and the speech acts accompanying
them are situated acts. By playing within the limits of the situation,
pragmatic acts establish, confirm, and recreate its setting. Anything in a
speech act, including its references to people and objects, can be interpreted
with respect to that setting by default. Pragmemes are defined as general
situational prototypes of pragmatic acts.
The situated nature of utterances involves the cultural background shared by
societies or smaller groups of people. A cultural perspective on pragmatics is
warranted and highly topical, as the availability or absence of shared
cultural knowledge affects communicative interactions (Kecskes 2014).
Sharifian (2017) offers a culturally based outlook on pragmemes, in which a
cultural pragmatic schema is presented as the overarching culturally acquired
cognitive influence on speech acts, pragmemes and practs. Goddard and
Wierzbicka (2004) define a cultural script as a cluster of established
practices, guiding the understanding of interactional moves. In order to
capture the utterance-context-relation systematically, pragmatic templates
have been introduced as holistic clusters of pairings between utterances on
the one side and elements of a proper utterance situation on the other
(Liedtke 2013). Van Dijk (2008) suggests context models incorporating
influences that are relevant for participants in producing and interpreting
utterances. Mazzone (2009) models utterance interpretation as a case of
pattern recognition in context. The relation between form and meaning of
utterances has been modelled as constructions in Construction grammar
(Goldberg 1995) and constructional schemas in Role and Reference Grammar (Van
Valin 2005). They have been adjusted to account for cultural and situational
factors that apply in the production and comprehension of language
(Diedrichsen 2013, 2020, 2022, Nolan 2022).
The panel seeks to find ways of systematically modelling
utterance-context-pairings as part of the pragmatic competence of speakers and
hearers. We are interested in approaches that address cultural and / or
situational influences on utterance production and interpretation, their
complex dynamics and interdependence, and their effect on linguistic choices
in a variety of communicative settings. We also welcome research on repair
mechanisms or workarounds for cases in which assumptions of shared knowledge
or relevance fail.
Panel contributions are expected to be oral presentations of 20 minutes,
followed by 10 minutes of discussion. Upon abstract submission to the IPrA
website, please indicate the panel your submission is intended for. Abstracts
should be 250-500 words long.
The deadline for abstract submission is 1 November 2022.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*************************** LINGUIST List Support ***************************
The 2020 Fund Drive is under way! Please visit https://funddrive.linguistlist.org
to find out how to donate and check how your university, country or discipline
ranks in the fund drive challenges. Or go directly to the donation site:
https://crowdfunding.iu.edu/the-linguist-list
Let's make this a short fund drive!
Please feel free to share the link to our campaign:
https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-33-2491
----------------------------------------------------------
More information about the LINGUIST
mailing list