33.217, Calls: Niger-Congo; Typology/Portugal

The LINGUIST List linguist at listserv.linguistlist.org
Fri Jan 21 08:44:58 UTC 2022


LINGUIST List: Vol-33-217. Fri Jan 21 2022. ISSN: 1069 - 4875.

Subject: 33.217, Calls: Niger-Congo; Typology/Portugal

Moderator: Malgorzata E. Cavar (linguist at linguistlist.org)
Student Moderator: Billy Dickson
Managing Editor: Lauren Perkins
Team: Helen Aristar-Dry, Everett Green, Sarah Goldfinch, Nils Hjortnaes,
      Joshua Sims, Billy Dickson, Amalia Robinson, Matthew Fort
Jobs: jobs at linguistlist.org | Conferences: callconf at linguistlist.org | Pubs: pubs at linguistlist.org

Homepage: http://linguistlist.org

Please support the LL editors and operation with a donation at:
           https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/

Editor for this issue: Everett Green <everett at linguistlist.org>
================================================================


Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 03:36:36
From: Jakob Maché [jakob.mache at letras.ulisboa.pt]
Subject: Complex Predicates in Niger-Congo. Workshop at the 11th Iberian Conference on African Studies held at the Universidade de Lisboa

 
Full Title: Complex Predicates in Niger-Congo. Workshop at the 11th Iberian Conference on African Studies held at the Universidade de Lisboa 
Short Title: CIEA 11 

Date: 06-Jul-2022 - 08-Jul-2022
Location: Lisbon, Portugal 
Contact Person: Jakob Maché
Meeting Email: jakob.mache at letras.ulisboa.pt
Web Site: https://ciea11.pt/index.php/en/ 

Linguistic Field(s): Typology 

Language Family(ies): Niger-Congo 

Call Deadline: 13-Feb-2022 

Meeting Description:

Niger-Congo is a highly diverse macro-family and at the same time one of the
lesser studied with respect to syntax. This workshop panel aims at deepening
the understanding of the uniformity and the variation of syntactic structures
in this phyla. One main morpho-syntactic characteristic of Niger-Congo is the
tendency to form complex predicates.

While Niger-Congo languages typically make use of preverbal tense, aspect,
modality and polarity markers, there are at least two big manifestation of
complex predication. First of all, there are serial verb constructions (SVCs)
which are well attested in many subfamilies of the Volta- Congo branch,
especially in Kwa (cf. Shluinsky 2017) and Benue (cf. Lord 1993, Déchaine
1993) but also in Gur (cf. Lord 1993: 128–129 for Kuusal and Dagbani, Hiraiwa
and Bodomo 2008 for Dàgáárè) and Senufo (cf. Lord 1993) and also outside the
Volta-Congo branch in Ijoid (cf. Williamson 1965, Carstens 2002). While most
languages have discontinuous SVCs (SUBJ- V1-OBJ-V2), some languages such as
Igbo make use of root serialisations (SUBJ-V1-V2-OBJ) for selected verb
classes.
Secondly, there are languages that rather employ valency changing suffixes
expressing func- tions like APPLICATIVE/BENEFACTIVE and others, which are
usually expressed as SVC in lan- guages of the first type. As for Bantu
languages, these suffixes are typically called verbal ex- tensions (cf. Voeltz
1977, Trithart 1983, Hyman 1993, 2007, Alsina 1992, Scott 1998, Bearth 2003:
126–127, Mchombo 2004, Van der Wal 2015). Apart from that, similar suffixes
are attested in languages of the Atlantic branch like Wolof or Manjako (cf.
Karlik 1972, Nouguier-Voisin 2002, Creissels and Nouguier-Voisin 2008). Some
languages such as the Benue language Igbo are interesting because they make
use of both SVC, root serialisation and verbal extensions (cf. Lord 1973,1977,
Déchaine 1993), similar things hold for the Bamileke languages with the
Bantoid group (cf. Hyman 1971, H. Keupdijo and C. Keupdijo 2021).

There are two alternative views, how SVCs relate to verbal extensions. On the
one hand side, Givón (1971: 149–152) and Baker (1991) assume that verbal
extensions are derived from an underlying SVC structure: V 2 is raised to V 1
attached to the left of it, turning V 1 into a verbal suffix of V 2 .
Accordingly, Givón (1971: 158–159) assumes that Proto-Niger-Congo had a wide
measure of verb serialisation and that verbal extensions emerged out of them.
On the other hand side, Voeltz (1977: 72–82) and Hyman (2004) suggest that
Proto-Niger-Congo had a much more pronounced system of verbal extensions,
which are on the decline and in Benue-Kwa due to phonological attrition and
that in these languages they have been almost entirely replaced by SVCs.


Call for Papers:

This panel invites contributions that are dedicated to one of the research
questions given below or any other related question relevant to the matter
here and which focus on languages that are con- sidered as Niger-Congo under
any of the recent classifications (cf. Williamson 1989, Williamson and Blench
2000, Dimmendaal 2008, Güldemann 2018). Analyses from any theoretical frame-
work are warmly welcome (CxG, cognitivsm, minimalism, constraint based
approaches, quantitative corpus linguistics).

1. What is the relation between SVCs, root serialisation and verbal extensions
(cf. Lord 1977, Déchaine 1993, Baker 1991)?
2. Which different types of SVCs, root serialisations and verbal extensions
are to be identified in the relevant languages?
3. Is there any evidence to decide which lead on the diachronic relation
between SVCs and verb extensions is the correct one?
(a) Did SVCs replace verb extensions due to the phonological attrition of the
latter (cf. Voeltz 1977: 72–82, Hyman 2004)?
(b) Did verb extensions grammaticalise from SVCs (cf. Givón 1971: 158–159)
(c) How does Güldemann’s (2011) observation relate to this according to which
the de- velopment of extreme morphological complexity of Bantu languages is
rather to be considered a recent process?
4. What is the ultimate source of verbal extensions?
5. How do SVC and verbal extensions interact with preverbal tense, aspect,
modality markers or negation?
6. How do West-African SVCs relate to SVCs in other macro-families?

Abstracts are accepted in the following languages: Portuguese, Castilian,
English or French. Pa- pers can be presented in one of these four languages;
however, simultaneous translation will not be available. Abstracts should not
exceed 300 words, with the first 50 words for a short abstract and the
remaining 250 words for a long abstract and should be submitted Before 13th
February 2022 to the following interface, indicating the name of this panel.
Successful papers will be confirmed by March 2022.

https://ciea11.pt/index.php/en/submission/submission-communications

Further information can be found on the conference site:
https://ciea11.pt/index.php/en/




------------------------------------------------------------------------------

***************************    LINGUIST List Support    ***************************
 The 2020 Fund Drive is under way! Please visit https://funddrive.linguistlist.org
  to find out how to donate and check how your university, country or discipline
     ranks in the fund drive challenges. Or go directly to the donation site:
                   https://crowdfunding.iu.edu/the-linguist-list

                        Let's make this a short fund drive!
                Please feel free to share the link to our campaign:
                    https://funddrive.linguistlist.org/donate/
 


----------------------------------------------------------
LINGUIST List: Vol-33-217	
----------------------------------------------------------






More information about the LINGUIST mailing list