LL-L "Phonology" 2002.10.29 (02) [E]

Lowlands-L admin at lowlands-l.net
Tue Oct 29 15:56:46 UTC 2002


======================================================================
 L O W L A N D S - L * 29.OCT.2002 (02) * ISSN 189-5582 * LCSN 96-4226
 Web Site: <http://www.lowlands-l.net>  Email: admin at lowlands-l.net
 Rules & Guidelines: <http://www.lowlands-l.net/rules.htm>
 Posting Address: <lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org>
 Server Manual: <http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/1.8c/userindex.html>
 Archive: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html>
=======================================================================
 You have received this because you have been subscribed upon request.
 To unsubscribe, please send the command "signoff lowlands-l" as message
 text from the same account to <listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org> or
 sign off at <http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html>.
=======================================================================
 A=Afrikaans Ap=Appalachian B=Brabantish D=Dutch E=English F=Frisian
 L=Limburgish LS=Lowlands Saxon (Low German) S=Scots Sh=Shetlandic
               V=(West)Flemish Z=Zeelandic (Zeêuws)
=======================================================================

From: Daniel Prohaska (daniel at ryan-prohaska.com)
Subject: LL-L "Phoneme Distribution"

Leve Lüü,

   I have a question pertaining the monophthongisation of Gmc */ai/ and
the relationship between Old Frisian, Old English and Old Saxon, here
goes:

  Whereas OE monophthongised Gmc */ai/ to OE /â/ (stân, âc, râp, clâth),
OF underwent a phonemic split into OF /â/ in Proto-OF /æ-/ in (*stæ-n,
*æ-k), and /â/ in (*râp, *klâth). Under which circumstances did proto-OF
split the Gmc phoneme */ai/? Lexical distribution appears to be the same
in all the modern Frisian varieties (ecept where loans from LG or D have
replaced the original F word).

   Eastern Westphalian and Eastphalian seem also to have undergone a
phonemic split in OS/LG /ê2/ (from Gmc */ai/). Is this a related change?
What were the criteria for the split? Lexical distribution? Frisian
influence? Do the OF/OS word pairs match in this split?

   Any answer would be appreciated,

Grötens,

Daniel

==================================END===================================
* Please submit postings to <lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org>.
* Postings will be displayed unedited in digest form.
* Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
* Commands for automated functions (including "signoff lowlands-l") are
  to be sent to <listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org> or at
  <http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html>.
 =======================================================================



More information about the LOWLANDS-L mailing list