LL-L "Lexicon" 2002.09.29 (04) [E]

[Lowlands-L]

======================================================================
 L O W L A N D S - L * 29.SEP.2002 (04) * ISSN 189-5582 * LCSN 96-4226
 Web Site: <http://www.lowlands-l.net>  Email: admin at lowlands-l.net
 Rules & Guidelines: <http://www.lowlands-l.net/rules.htm>
 Posting Address: <lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org>
 Server Manual: <http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/1.8c/userindex.html>
 Archive: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html>
=======================================================================
 You have received this because have been subscribed upon request. To
 unsubscribe, please send the command "signoff lowlands-l" as message
 text from the same account to <listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org> or
 sign off at <http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html>.
=======================================================================
 A=Afrikaans Ap=Appalachian B=Brabantish D=Dutch E=English F=Frisian
 L=Limburgish LS=Lowlands Saxon (Low German) S=Scots Sh=Shetlandic
               V=(West)Flemish Z=Zeelandic (Zeêuws)
=======================================================================

From: Antero Helasvuo <antero.helasvuo at welho.com>
Subject: LL-L "History" 2002.09.29 (01) [E]

> > I remember vaguely reading somewhere long ago that it is
> > believed that the salient differences between the
> > Scandinavian (North Germanic) and the other Germanic
> > languages are due to a Scandinavia-specific pre-I.-E. substrate,
> > but no details whatsoever.
>
>I happen to have in my hands an article (The Baltic Sea Prosodic Area
>Revisited) of Finnish linguist Kalevi Wiik.
>
>Mari Sarv
>.  I read somewhere (quite some time ago) that
>there are some anthropological and biological indications that point in
that
>direction also.  Does anyone know anything about that?
>
>Thanks, and regards,
>Reinhard/Ron

There is a lot of material about and of professor Kalevi Wiik to be found
in the internet. Here is one article in English which sheds light to his
theories.

>http://www.lib.helsinki.fi/bff/399/wiik.html

Antero Helasvuo
Pitäjänmäentie 35 D 32
00370 HELSINKI
Finland

Tel (fax on demand) + 358 9 555396
antero.helasvuo at welho.com

----------

From: R. F. Hahn <sassisch at yahoo.com>
Subject: History

Thanks, Antero!

I had a look at the article.  It sure flies in the face of the traditional
assumption that, with the exception of the Saame group (considered
peripheral), Uralic languages are johnnies-come-lately west of the Ural
Mountains (later to be overlaid by Slavic in what is now Northwestern
Russia).

I find this to be a fascinating breath of fresh air (and astounding that
Wiik includes Northern Germany in the original "Finno-Ugric" area), although
I cannot yet tell how much water the theory holds, since this English
language article is a popular-media-adapted version and does not provide all
that much scientific detail.

Cheers!
Reinhard/Ron

==================================END===================================
 * Please submit postings to <lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org>.
 * Postings will be displayed unedited in digest form.
 * Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
 * Commands for automated functions (including "signoff lowlands-l") are
   to be sent to <listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org> or at
   <http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html>.
 * Please use only Plain Text format, not Rich Text (HTML) or any other
   type of format, in your submissions
 =======================================================================