LL-L "Grammar" 2004.10.06 (05) [E]

Lowlands-L lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Wed Oct 6 23:46:02 UTC 2004


======================================================================
L O W L A N D S - L * 06.OCT.2004 (05) * ISSN 189-5582 * LCSN 96-4226
http://www.lowlands-l.net * lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Rules & Guidelines: http://www.lowlands-l.net/index.php?page=rules
Posting: lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org or lowlands-l at lowlands-l.net
Server Manual: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/1.8c/userindex.html
Archives: http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html
Encoding: Unicode (UTF-8) [Please switch your view mode to it.]
=======================================================================
You have received this because you have been subscribed upon request.
To unsubscribe, please send the command "signoff lowlands-l" as message
text from the same account to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or
sign off at http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
=======================================================================
A=Afrikaans Ap=Appalachian B=Brabantish D=Dutch E=English F=Frisian
L=Limburgish LS=Lowlands Saxon (Low German) N=Northumbrian
S=Scots Sh=Shetlandic V=(West)Flemish Z=Zeelandic (Zeêuws)
=======================================================================

From: Ruth & Mark Dreyer <mrdreyer at lantic.net>
Subject: LL-L "Grammar" 2004.10.04 (01) [E]

Dear Gabriele, Ron, & All,

Subject: LL-L "Grammar" 2004.10.03 (04) [E]

Further on the usages & abusages of "shall" & "will".

> I was taught to use 'will' & 'won't' in the context of intent, as in,
'Will
> you have another cup of tea?" & "I won't impose, but thank you!"
> 'Shall' & 'shan't' on the other hand apply in cases where will is not an
> issue. "I shall have to go home early." & "You shan't, though!"
> Only in the cases of 'I'd', 'you'd', 'they'd' & 'I'll, 'you'll', they'll'
> does the distinction pass away.
> "I'll be seeing you," "You'll have to try again," "They'll come tomorrow."
&
> "I'd like to be!" "you'd have to bend."
> "They'd refuse."

This distinction is illuminated by the sentences, "I should go to Church
this Sunday, but I won't." & "He will play cards for money, though he
shouldn't." Any bets on what eventually happens in either case? See; both
forms are necessary, & may even be necessary in the same sentence. They
carry different meaning.

Yrs,
Mark

----------

From: sam s claire <gamlhs at juno.com>
Subject: LL-L "Grammar" 2004.10.05 (01) [E]

Bill:  My obvious interpretation of "dassn't" is "dare not."
Is that right?

==============================END===================================
* Please submit postings to lowlands-l at listserv.linguistlist.org.
* Postings will be displayed unedited in digest form.
* Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
* Commands for automated functions (including "signoff lowlands-l") are
  to be sent to listserv at listserv.linguistlist.org or at
  http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
=======================================================================



More information about the LOWLANDS-L mailing list