=======================================================================
<p>
L O W L A N D S - L * ISSN 189-5582 * LCSN 96-4226
<p>
http://www.lowlands-l.net * lowlands.list@gmail.com
<p>
Rules & Guidelines: http://www.lowlands-l.net/rules.php
<p>
Posting: lowlands-l@listserv.linguistlist.org - lowlands.list@gmail.com
<p>
Commands ("signoff lowlands-l" etc.): listserv@listserv.net
<p>
Server Manual: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/1.8c/userindex.html
<p>
Archives: http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html
<p>
Encoding: Unicode (UTF-8) [Please switch your view mode to it.]
<p>
Administration: lowlands.list@gmail.com or sassisch@yahoo.com
<p>
<p>
You have received this because you have been subscribed upon request.
To unsubscribe, please send the command "signoff lowlands-l" as message
text from the same account to listserv@listserv.linguistlist.org or
sign off at http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
<p>
<p>
A=Afrikaans Ap=Appalachian B=Brabantish D=Dutch E=English F=Frisian
L=Limburgish LS=Lowlands Saxon (Low German) N=Northumbrian
S=Scots Sh=Shetlandic V=(West) Flemish Z=Zeelandic (Zeeuws)
<p>
=======================================================================
<font size="2"><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">L O W L A N D S - L - 10 January 2007 - Volume 04</span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">
<span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">=========================================================================</span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">
From: </span><span id="_user_wolf_thunder51@yahoo.co.uk" style="color: rgb(0, 104, 28); font-family: arial,sans-serif;">Paul Finlow-Bates <<a href="mailto:wolf_thunder51@yahoo.co.uk">wolf_thunder51@yahoo.co.uk</a>></span>
<br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">Subject: LL-L 'Language politics' 2007.01.10 (02) [E]</span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><span id="_user_wolf_thunder51@yahoo.co.uk" style="color: rgb(0, 104, 28); font-family: arial,sans-serif;">
<br></span><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">I
personally look forward to it; maybe then we'll get our language back.
I actually expect the Great Chinese Miracle to collapse in a heap in
the next couple of decades at most, but at least everyone will have
learned another language, and that's got to be good news.</span></font>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><font size="2"> </font></div>
<div style="font-size: 12pt; font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><font size="2">Paul Finlow-Bates<br><br>----------<br><br>From: <span id="_user_wolf_thunder51@yahoo.co.uk" style="color: rgb(0, 104, 28);">R. F. Hahn <<a href="mailto:sassisch@yahoo.com">
sassisch@yahoo.com</a>></span><br>Subject: Language politics<br><br>Being used by about one quarter of mankind as a native or non-native language, Mandarin is undoubtedly one of the most "important" languages on earth, and China's "global reemergence" will no doubt add to this. However, for Mandarin and for written Chinese to come even close to competing with English on a global basis would take a lot of time and doing. Written Chinese as it is now has certain "neutrality" advantages, but it is far too cumbersome to handle and its acquisition is far too time-consuming to be suitable as an international medium.
<br><br>I regard the mentioned article and its headline as being nothing short of sensationalist and actually silly. Talking of English as a potentially endangered language at this time is ludicrous. It seems to be merely an attention-grabbing stunt and has a xenophobic scare-tactics ring to me.
<br><br>As far as I know, the government of Mainland China does not embrace Confucianism, at least not officially. To the contrary. The philosophy's (and its spin-off religion's) hierarchically based premise has always run counter to socialist ideas. Furthermore
</font><font size="2">, considering the general global tendency toward wanting to increase social equality</font><font size="2">, it would have a snowball's chance in hell of becoming accepted worldwide. While Taoism and Buddhism are (after Islam and the Baha'i Faith) currently the fastest growing philosophies and religions in the "West" (especially among intellectuals), Confucianism has hardly any followers that are not East Asian or of East Asian descent.
<br><br>Most countries that can afford it donate funding and materials to foreign educational institutions for the purpose of promoting their languages, cultures and ultimately ideas. China is now in a financial position of joining in on this. There is nothing remarkable about this. Interpreting it as a sign of impending global take-over seems to me rather silly.
<br></font></div>
<br>Regards,<br>Reinhard/Ron<br>
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
<p>
==============================END===================================
<p>
* Please submit postings to lowlands-l@listserv.linguistlist.org.
<p>
* Postings will be displayed unedited in digest form.
<p>
* Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
<p>
* Commands for automated functions (including "signoff lowlands-l")
<p>
are to be sent to listserv@listserv.linguistlist.org or at
<p>
http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
<p>
*********************************************************************