=======================================================================
<p>
L O W L A N D S - L * ISSN 189-5582 * LCSN 96-4226
<p>
http://www.lowlands-l.net * lowlands.list@gmail.com
<p>
Rules & Guidelines: http://www.lowlands-l.net/rules.php
<p>
Posting: lowlands-l@listserv.linguistlist.org - lowlands.list@gmail.com
<p>
Commands ("signoff lowlands-l" etc.): listserv@listserv.net
<p>
Server Manual: http://www.lsoft.com/manuals/1.8c/userindex.html
<p>
Archives: http://listserv.linguistlist.org/archives/lowlands-l.html
<p>
Encoding: Unicode (UTF-8) [Please switch your view mode to it.]
<p>
Administration: lowlands.list@gmail.com or sassisch@yahoo.com
<p>
<p>
You have received this because you have been subscribed upon request.
To unsubscribe, please send the command "signoff lowlands-l" as message
text from the same account to listserv@listserv.linguistlist.org or
sign off at http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
<p>
<p>
A=Afrikaans Ap=Appalachian B=Brabantish D=Dutch E=English F=Frisian
L=Limburgish LS=Lowlands Saxon (Low German) N=Northumbrian
S=Scots Sh=Shetlandic V=(West) Flemish Z=Zeelandic (Zeeuws)
<p>
=======================================================================
<span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"> </span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">L O W L A N D S - L - 07 September 2007 - Volume 06</span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">
<span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">Song Contest: <a href="http://lowlands-l.net/contest/">lowlands-l.net/contest/</a> (- 31 Dec. 2007)</span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">
========================================================================</span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">From: </span>
<span id="_user_sandy@scotstext.org" style="color: rgb(0, 104, 28); font-family: arial,sans-serif;">Sandy Fleming</span><span style="font-weight: normal; font-family: arial,sans-serif;" class="lg"> <<a href="mailto:sandy@scotstext.org">
sandy@scotstext.org</a>></span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">Subject: LL-L "Language perception" 2007.09.06 (03) [E]</span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">
<br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><div style="direction: ltr; font-family: arial,sans-serif;">> From: R. F. Hahn <<a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:sassisch@yahoo.com">sassisch@yahoo.com
</a>><br>> Subject: Language perception<br>><br>> Welcome back, Jonny! Good to "see" you.<br>><br>> Personally, I would be at a loss if I had to rank languages. To me<br>> it's like comparing apples, oranges, spinach, broccoli, parsley,
<br>> asparagus, plums, cherries, potatoes and whatever. I like all of<br>> them. From day to day and from hour to hour my answer would be<br>> different. For me, switching language is like going from one room to
<br>> another. Each room's interior is different and each room's window<br>> offers a view of another world.<br><br>I'm not sure I could compare two whole languages and come up with a<br>favourite (and as for Jonny putting his _own_ language first - well!),
<br>but sometimes there are aspects of languages that I like better than the<br>way the same thing is done in other languages.<br><br>For example, the Welsh way of building noun phrases has always been one<br>of my favourites, the way it drops all noun inflections (except plural
<br>endings, which are a mess in Welsh), even for the genitive, and depends<br>entirely on word order with the qualifiers following the qualified word<br>(the opposite way round from English, but more sensible to my mind).
<br>It's all very neat and simple and orderly. But it's not perfect - the<br>way plurals and articles are handled makes a complete mess of it when<br>they're used, which then again doesn't matter once you're a fluent
<br>speaker as you stop noticing details any more.<br><br>It's interesting for me to compare two close languages like Scots and<br>English and think about how different they seem by nature. Compared to<br>Scots, English seems a very logical language with a large and very
<br>precise active vocabulary, while Scots seems to try to use common sense<br>and context much more than English, and tends to compose many concepts<br>as idiom rather than having a word for almost everything as in English.
<br><br>But are these really properties of the languages or is it just that<br>English has been written a lot and Scots hasn't? And that people read a<br>lot in English but not in Scots?<br><br>I tend to agree with Jonny's son that Latin comes across as a simply
<br>superior language, but I suspect real Latin as spoken by the Romans<br>wasn't like that, and that this is an illusion created by the idealistic<br>Roman writers we're familiar with, who tried to write on the principle
<br>of "one idea, one word". I would imagine that real Latin was a mucky pup<br>just like any other language. There doesn't seem to be anything in the<br>actual grammar of Latin that I find praiseworthy in the way I find the
<br>Welsh (singular, article-free) noun phrases particularly nice. Latin<br>seems mostly a weak declension system propped up with prepositions and<br>an overblown set of verb conjugations (which then again, is fine if you
<br>like that sort of thing). But the idealistic way it's been written and<br>handed down to us makes it seem much neater and more expressive than<br>your everyday language.<br><br>Then again, there's French, which I think many British people at least
<br>tend to think of as a _real_ language, unlike, say English, German,<br>Swedish, Welsh or Japanese. Somehow we perceive French as difficult and<br>sophisticated and the fact that it's just plain weird and approaching
<br>meltdown from internal and external forces will never make any<br>difference to that perception.<br><br>In summary, I think that you can look at any language and see the same<br>thing - a mixture of chaos and order, ugliness and beauty. But our
<br>perception of a given language as a whole might be purely cultural.<br></div><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;" class="sg"><br>Sandy Fleming<br><a onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://scotstext.org/" target="_blank">
http://scotstext.org/</a><br></span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">----------</span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">
<span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">From: R. F. Hahn <</span><a style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="mailto:sassisch@yahoo.com">sassisch@yahoo.com
</a><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">></span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">Subject: Language perception</span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">
<br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">Sandy,</span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">
I agree with your views by and large.</span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">You wrote:</span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">
<br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><div style="margin-left: 40px; font-family: arial,sans-serif;">In summary, I think that you can look at any language and see the same<br>thing - a mixture of chaos and order, ugliness and beauty. But our
<br>perception of a given language as a whole might be purely cultural.<br></div><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">I would add at the end "... and political, perhaps also historical."
</span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">Also, don't forget the traditional bias in Western education in which "classical" means "Latin and Greek" which means "epitome," and there is the old assumption that complex grammar is a sign of superiority (which has a parallel in India where Sanskrit is considered superior to today's Indo-Aryan languages).
</span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">Part and parcel of this is the afterglow of the one-time European obsession with French culture and language and the opinion that anything Germanic, Slavonic and Celtic is crude in comparison with things Romance (perhaps because it's down home, "ordinary" and not connected with Rome). I often wonder if all this goes as far back as to the times of Charlemagne on the Continent and to the Norman Invasion in Britain, later to be reinforced by the Francophile craze in the 18th century and the Italian opera craze roughly a century later. Well, perhaps it goes all the way back to the Roman invasions of Northern Europe.
</span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">Regards,</span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><span style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">
Reinhard/Ron</span><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;"><br style="font-family: arial,sans-serif;">
•
<p>
==============================END===================================
<p>
* Please submit postings to lowlands-l@listserv.linguistlist.org.
<p>
* Postings will be displayed unedited in digest form.
<p>
* Please display only the relevant parts of quotes in your replies.
<p>
* Commands for automated functions (including "signoff lowlands-l")
<p>
are to be sent to listserv@listserv.linguistlist.org or at
<p>
http://linguistlist.org/subscribing/sub-lowlands-l.html.
<p>
*********************************************************************