No subject

owner-nahuat-l at mrs.umn.edu owner-nahuat-l at mrs.umn.edu
Tue Nov 20 15:24:46 UTC 2001


> >From schwallr Mon Nov 19 14:35:15 2001
>Received: from amethyst.deans.umd.edu (root at amethyst.deans.umd.edu
>[128.8.10.205])
>         by cda.mrs.umn.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id fAJKZDl78033
>         for <nahuat-l at mrs.umn.edu>; Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:35:15 -0600 (CST)
>Received: from [128.8.23.228] (bay7-31.dial.umd.edu [128.8.23.159])
>         by amethyst.deans.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA24607;
>         Mon, 19 Nov 2001 15:35:09 -0500 (EST)
>Message-Id: <l0310281eb81f122a2301@[128.8.23.228]>
>In-Reply-To:
>  <Pine.GSO.4.21.0111181819590.11116-100000 at bergman.umail.ucsb.edu>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2001 14:54:15 -0500
>To: Kevin P Smith <ksmith at umail.ucsb.edu>, nahuat-l at mrs.umn.edu
>From: "John B. Carlson" <jcarlson at pop.deans.umd.edu>
>Subject: Re: Tlaloc inscription
>
>At 6:32 PM -0800 11/18/01, Kevin P Smith wrote:
>
> >Dear Neteros:
> >In an Inquisition record I'm working on there is a reference to an ancient
> >statue of Tlaloc, which bore on its forehead a chalchihuitl "con una
> >figura por la una parte, que dicen es cuenta de seis dias." Can anyone
> >speculate as to what figure this might refer? The scribe here is
> >translating testimony given in Nahuatl. Was Tlaloc especially connected
> >with a particular trecena or veintena in the Aztec calendar?
> >
> >Thanks in advance for any information.
> >
> >--
> >Kevin Paul Smith
> >University of California Santa Barbara
> >ksmith at umail.ucsb.edu
>
>Kevin,
>
>One picture would have been worth all the testimony on this subject.
>
>(1) Is the inquisition record from Mexico city, or somewhere else? It would
>make some difference. Where did this take place?
>
>(2) Knowing what period this sculpture dated from would also be critical.
>Obviously, one can't know, but the assumption of a date from the time of
>contact is only an hypothesis.
>
>(3) If the number associated with the presumed tonalpohualli date were
>seven, I would have had a guess as to the sign. As it is, I think this is a
>virtually insoluble problem.
>
>Any chance you have more information on this record?
>
>John Carlson
Sender: owner-nahuat-l at cda.mrs.umn.edu
Precedence: bulk



More information about the Nahuat-l mailing list