Uto-Aztecan Homeland

[Michael Mccafferty]

I was just asking. I don't know anything about it. :-)



On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Richley Crapo wrote:

> >>> mmccaffe at INDIANA.EDU 09/25/04 15:47 PM >>>
> What is the gist of her hypothesis? Or can it be succintly gisted?
> Michael
> ------
> [Richley]
> And how was her position received by others in the Bellwood and Renfrew work? (I know she was generally supporting Bellwood, so was this just a volume of like-minded authors or did it include other perspectives that might not have accepted Hill's proposal?) Is it your sense that her's will become the dominant viewpoint and replace the Northern origin perspective?
>
>
> On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Swanton, M. wrote:
>
> > I believe you are referring to Jane Hill's hypothesis.  One version of it
> > was published in the 2001 American Anthropologist (vol. 103: 913-34).  This
> > was discussed more recently in a volume edited by Peter Bellwood and Colin
> > Renfrew "Examining the farming/language dispersal hypothesis" published by
> > the McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Richley Crapo [mailto:RCRAPO at HASS.USU.EDU]
> > Sent: vrijdag 24 september 2004 22:04
> > To: NAHUAT-L at LISTS.UMN.EDU
> > Subject: Uto-Aztecan Homeland
> >
> >
> > IIRC, there was a major article on Uto-Aztecan historical linguistics that
> > was published within the last 2 years (perhaps by one of our own here) that
> > argued for a more southern location of the U-A homeland. Does this ring a
> > bell with anyone who knows the name of the article or in which journal it
> > was published.
> > Richley
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>