quimochihuililizque

[Benjamin Johnson]

Hello! I am a second year graduate student at the University of Chicago 
with my first post to this list. Before asking my question, I wanted to 
praise the list generally for its interested and collaborative tone, 
which encourages the small type of question I am about to ask in 
addition to bigger and more involved discussions such as the one over 
"Tepotzoa."

Anyway, mine is a very short question: In one document I'm working with 
I encounter the word "quimochihuililizque" (roughly: they will build 
it, reverential) which seems to have one applicative marker too many. 
Of course, the extra -li could have been nothing more than an error of 
recopying, but I wanted to confirm that it is a departure from some 
sort of "canonical" form.

Thank you.

Ben Johnson
UChicago