[RNLD] ERA reporting of archive deposits as NTROs (in Australia)

[Dorothea Hoffmann]

Hey Mark,


I am not sure how much these projects focus on NTROs, but DoBeS has
recently started to fund documentation projects based on their own archived
material for cross-corpus analysis. This might be a start to look at?

http://dobes.mpi.nl/research-projects/

All the best,

Dorothea


On 5 August 2014 01:00, Mark W. Post <markwpost at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear RNLDers,
>
> In the current ERA reporting round, there seems to be an increase in
> attention to Non-Traditional Research Output (NTRO). Here at UNE, we're
> trying to work out how archive deposits (corpora of language-documentary
> materials) can be assessed in the NTRO context, and, ultimately,
> effectively weighted in relation to TROs. In addition to general problems
> of equivalence, one of the concerns is the fact that deposits often grow in
> scale and richness over time, whereas there might be only one recognizable
> submission/acceptance "event".
>
> Does anyone have experience with this, or is anyone currently preparing an
> NTRO submission along these lines for the current ERA round?
>
> Many thanks in advance,
>
> Mark
>



-- 
Dorothea Hoffmann
https://sites.google.com/site/hoffmanndorothea/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/resource-network-linguistic-diversity/attachments/20140805/06a77802/attachment.html>