[RNLD] applied linguistics and documentation/description projects

[Mark W. Post]

Apologies, the references I cited earlier are:

Anderson, G. D. S. (2011). "Language Hotspots: what (applied) 
linguistics and education should do about language endangerment in the 
twenty-first century." Language and Education 25(4): 273-289.

Hildebrandt, K. A. (2018) Teaching about endangered languages in the 
undergraduate curriculum. Language and Linguistics Compass  DOI: 
https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12283

@Brenda: I'm certainly interested in learning about multi-participant 
projects involving, for example, botanists, anthropologists, 
archaeologists, etc., and linguists in a general sense, but what I'd 
like to focus on for present purposes is project-based collaborations 
between applied linguists and documentary/descriptive linguists, of the 
nature outlined by Anderson in the article cited above.

Thanks again
Mark

------ Original Message ------
From: "Brenda Boerger" <brenda_boerger at sil.org>
To: "Mark W. Post" <markwpost at gmail.com>; "RNLD list" 
<r-n-l-d at unimelb.edu.au>
Sent: 08-Jul-18 8:36:14 AM
Subject: RE: [RNLD] applied linguistics and documentation/description 
projects

>Mark,
>
>
>
>Could you give fuller references for the two you quoted? I’ve taken 
>student interns for fieldwork with multi-focus projects, which have led 
>to renewed interest in language and culture. Not sure if that scratches 
>where you itch.
>
>~b
>
>
>
>Brenda H. Boerger, PhD, Coordinator
>SIL Language and Culture Documentation Services
>7500 West Camp Wisdom Road
>Dallas, TX 75236      USA
>
>
>
>Mobile: 972-273-9356
>Skype ID:  brenda_boerger1
>https://www.sil.org/biography/brenda-h-boerger
>
>
>
>Summer Intern Office: 210 Member Services Bldg,
>972-708-7400, x2899
>
>
>
>From: Mark W. Post [mailto:markwpost at gmail.com]
>Sent: Sunday, July 8, 2018 6:57 AM
>To: RNLD list <r-n-l-d at unimelb.edu.au>
>Subject: [RNLD] applied linguistics and documentation/description 
>projects
>
>
>
>Hello RNLD-ers,
>
>
>
>There has been some discussion about coordination of efforts among 
>applied and descriptive linguists in documentation projects that are 
>envisioned as having a potential maintenance/revitalization component 
>(e.g. Anderson 2011, Hildebrandt 2018), with a view toward improving 
>potential maintenance/revitalization outcomes for 
>languages/communities. I was wondering how much this has actually 
>started happening in practice, and if so what the experiences/outcomes 
>have been like.
>
>
>
>Could anyone point to some examples of past or current projects 
>involving in-principle-distinct "applied" and "documentary/descriptive" 
>components, ideally with multiple personnel associated to these 
>different components, ideally also with some associated literature (or 
>websites, reports, blog posts, whatever)? What I'm mainly interested in 
>here is the multi-linguist collaboration dynamic, but if there are 
>other relevant case studies, I'm be interested in learning about them 
>too.
>
>
>
>If there is a significant response off-list, I'll post a summary.
>
>
>
>Many thanks in advance,
>
>Mark
>
>
>
>Mark W. Post | Lecturer in Linguistics
>The University of Sydney
>Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences
>
>Room N367, John Woolley Building A20, Science Road | The University of 
>Sydney | NSW | 2006 | AUSTRALIA
>+61 2 8627 6854 (ofc)  | +61 4 5527 0776 (mob)
>mark.post at sydney.edu.au  | http://sydney.edu.au | 
>http://sydney.academia.edu/MarkWPost
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/resource-network-linguistic-diversity/attachments/20180708/c032dbf6/attachment-0001.html>