Another reason why we sometimes HAVE to reply to the list
George Fowler h(317)726-1482 o(812)855-2829
GFOWLER at ucs.indiana.edu
Fri Apr 7 11:37:42 UTC 1995
Alex Rudd posted a very reasoned exposition to the list as to why it is
preferable to reply directly to individuals rather than wasting all that
bandwidth by replying to the list. I agree, BUT there's one strong reason why
I, and I presume many others as well, am sometimes OBLIGED to reply to the
list. I get the list without headers pertaining to the original posting. Many
times the poster does not identify his/her email address within the body of the
posting (no signature appended either, alas). If I do not know the individual,
I have no means of replying directly, and if I am so moved, or have something
useful to say, the only means of replying is directly to the list.
I have complained about this before. Everyone should make SURE to include
his/her email address at the bottom of any posting!
There's also the question of judgment. Consider the recent posting on
consonant clusters (sequences) in Russian. I actually replied directly to the
original poster (who gave an email address in the original posting! Molodets!),
but I enjoyed reading all the other suggestions. This strikes me as a
reasonable case.
Apropos of short headers, I have done nothing to configure it that way; it
simply happened. This must be characteristic of other subscribers as well; I
know some people get a screenful of headers, as I have seen them when messages
have been forwarded to me.
I close with my signature file! <Short version!>
George Fowler
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
George Fowler GFowler at Indiana.Edu [Email]
Dept. of Slavic Languages 1-812-855-2829 [office]
Ballantine 502 1-317-726-1482 [home]
Indiana University 1-812-855-2624/-2608/-9906 [dept.]
Bloomington, IN 47405 USA 1-812-855-2107 [dept. fax]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
More information about the SEELANG
mailing list