scholarly publishing
charlesg
charlesg at HUMANITIES1.COHUMS.OHIO-STATE.EDU
Fri Mar 3 18:53:36 UTC 1995
The comments by David Birnbaum and Robert Beard are well
taken, but I think that we are not yet ready for electronic
publishing. First, there are the technical and social
obstacles pointed out by David. Moreover, formats change.
How many of you now still play 45 rpm records or can read
materials written on a TRS-80 or even a CP/M computer?
Especially given the special symbols needed for Slavic, and
the elaborate use of nightmarish symbols, brackets, super-
and subscripts, etc. by Slavic linguists, trying to reach a
standard is very difficult. Although Unicode, worked on by
David, is a step in the right direction, it does not provide
all the symbols and is not yet generally implemented, in any
case. How many different graphics formats are there that
illustrations could be put into. A printed book is one
format that is not likely to be obsolete soon, even though
it has some disadvantages. Also, for the near future (at
least ten years), books are the one way that our colleagues
in some of the technically less advanced countries will be
able to use materials.
Another point is that in my experience, very few authors are
able to to adequate camera-ready copy without considerable
hand-holding, in spite of Slavica's very explicit
directions. I think the same would apply to electronic
publishing.
As to cost: electonic publishing is "free" only insofar as
somebody pays the cost of the distribution electronically.
As you know, there is now considerable discussion about
making the users of the Internet pay their own way.
Electronic publishing is not and probably never will be
free, although if done adequately it probably can be
considerably cheaper than what we do now (although have you
ever tried curling up in bed with a good book on your
terminal?)
More to follow
More information about the SEELANG
mailing list