Avoiding disagreement about non-agreement
Loren A. BILLINGS
billings at rz.uni-leipzig.de
Thu Aug 28 00:32:00 UTC 1997
>>(III) The reason I write "neut.sg." in scare quotes in (f) and (h) is
>>that, at least in Ukrainian, there is good reason to distinguish real
>>neuter-singular agreement--i.e., with a real neuter noun, as in (i)--with
>>non-agreement, as in (h) and (j).
>>
>>i. Vikno bulo zastavlene (kvitamy)
>> [window]neut.nom.sg. [was cluttered]neut.sg flowers
>>
>>j. Vikno bulo zastavleno (kvitamy)
>> [window]neut.acc.sg [was cluttered]non-agreement flowers
>
>How do we know that it is Nom in (i) and Acc in (j) and not vice versa?
>
>Alina Israeli
<aisrael at AMERICAN.EDU>
Alina's keeping me on my toes! But I'll rise to the challenge: As it
turns out, quantified expressions come to the rescue. If the subject
(podle^za^s^cee) of the sentence consists of a numeral + noun, then the
participial agreement must be with _-no_, not _-ne_, as the following
examples show:
k. *Pivkimnaty bulo zastavlene (kvitamy)
1/2room [was cluttered]neut.sg. flowers
l. Pivkimnaty bulo zastavleno (kvitamy)
1/2room [was cluttered]non-agreement flowers
That is, when the clausal subject lacks agreement features (i.e., there is
nothing to agree with), then the _-no_ form of the participle MUST be used.
(The copula does not show this distinction; it's _bulo_ in both neut.sg.
and non-agreement environments.) Other subjects which REQUIRE -no/-to
participles are clausal ones. The only time -ne/-te forms can be used is
in agreement with a subject nominal that has lexical neuter gender (in the
singular).
I'm pleased that this discussion of Ukrainian came back to "half"!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Loren A. BILLINGS, Ph.D. (e-mail: billings at rz.uni-leipzig.de)
Institut fuer Slavistik Home address:
Universitaet Leipzig (Preferred for receiving mail!)
Augustusplatz 9 Funkenburgstr. 14
D-04109 Leipzig D-04105 Leipzig
Dept. secretary (1): +49 (341) 973 7450 Home phone: +49 (341) 980 7227
Dept. secretary (2): +49 (341) 973 7454 Ofc. phone: +49 (341) 973 7475
Dept. telefax: +49 (341) 973 7499 (Ofc. location: Hochhaus 16-8)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the SEELANG
mailing list