etymology of Belarus
Robert De Lossa
rdelossa at FAS.HARVARD.EDU
Fri Dec 15 14:49:47 UTC 2000
>
>This should, and presumably at some time has, tempted Slavists. Was
>Novgorod Velikiy further away than a smaller version of Novgorod, from the
>perspective of someone important? Should Ukrainians be proud to have been
>called "Little Russians" because this meant they were closer to the heart
>of Rus', while the "Great Russians" were therefore peripheral?
>
>Tom Priestly
Omeljan Pritsak and John Reshetar, Jr. deal with this explicitly in
"Ukraine and the Dialectics of Nation-Building," Slavic Review 22(2) 1963:
24-28. According to their argument, the point of reference is Byzantine and
has to do with the two Rus metropolitanates that came to exist after 1303.
They also mention the practice of metropolis (mikros) vs. colony (megas)
that Robert Orr mentions.
Rob De Lossa
____________________________________________________
Robert De Lossa
Director of Publications
Ukrainian Research Institute, Harvard University
1583 Massachusetts Ave., Cambridge, MA 02138
617-496-8768; fax. 617-495-8097
reply to: rdelossa at fas.harvard.edu
http://www.huri.harvard.edu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use your web browser to search the archives, control your subscription
options, and more. Visit and bookmark the SEELANGS Web Interface at:
http://members.home.net/lists/seelangs/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the SEELANG
mailing list