Language and democracy; Luk'ianov; photographs from Ukraine
Natalia Pylypiuk
natalia.pylypiuk at UALBERTA.CA
Fri Dec 3 11:39:05 UTC 2004
On Dec 3, 2004, at 3:43 AM, John Dunn wrote:
> Hm. Perhaps this is the time to give our profession a boost by
> promoting the idea that every media outlet in the anglophone world
> should employ at least one Slavonic linguist.
Excellent point. We might also use recent events to convince
university administrators that Slavic Studies represent a complex and
fascinating set of disciplines, a set that cannot be reduced by
metonymy to Russian Studies alone.
I draw your attention to Fedor Luk'ianov's article (in Russian),
*Evropeiskii renesans Ukrainy* (and attendant articles) which appeared
in the Russian internet publication Gazeta.ru 2.XII.04
http://www.gazeta.ru/comments/2004/12/02_a_206242.shtml
For those who specialize in languages other than Russian, a
translation by Olha Bohatyrenko for UKL, is given below.
To view photographs of citizens In Kyiv and Maidan nezalezhnosty
(Independence Square):
29 November - http://dere.com.ua/vybir/vybir_6.shtml
28 November - http://dere.com.ua/vybir/vybir_5.shtml
27 November - http://dere.com.ua/vybir/vybir_4.shtml
26 November - http://dere.com.ua/vybir/vybir_3.shtml
26 November - http://dere.com.ua/vybir/vybir_2.shtml
24 November - http://dere.com.ua/vybir/vybir.shtml
Cheers,
Natalia Pylypiuk (U of Alberta)
******
Fyodor Lukyanov, Ukraine's European Rebirth, gazeta.ru, 2 December 2004
(Transl. by Olha Bohatyrenko)
Whatever the outcome of the power crisis in Kyiv, one of its key
consequences is obvious: Europe has discovered Ukraine. This fact may
be very consequential for all involved - for Ukraine per se, for the
European Union, and for Russia.
During all the ten years of Leonid Kuchma's presidency, the EU has not
paid Ukraine any special attention. The country remained in the
background, shadowed, on the one hand, by Central and Eastern European
states seeking to join the EU, and by Russia whom Brussels wanted to
engage in a long-term strategic partnership, on the other hand. Kiev's
reputation in Europe was worse than Moscow's: admittedly, according to
its indicators of corruption, stagnation and state effectiveness, as
well as its anti-democratic trends, Ukraine stood even farther from the
ideal than Russia. All attempts to establish long-term promising
relations with Kyiv would get stuck in a peculiar Ukrainian politics,
where interests of various cliques and groups - financial-industrial,
political, ethnic, religious - are tangled to form a very intricate and
very solid web.
A mere two years ago, virtually all European officials admitted
off-the-record: Ukraine is hopeless. The concentrated intervention from
without that took place during the presidential campaign detonated the
complicated domestic political balance within Ukraine. And, despite the
fact that the collision is far from being over, we can already talk
about some of its consequences.
First, for the first time in a long time, European rhetoric has
geopolitical connotations. That is very surprising and unusual for the
European Union, which has always denied its geopolitical interests.
Brussels insists that it is not expanding in the traditional meaning of
the word, but that it is conducting a peaceful and willing expansion in
the areas of rights, law, democracy, and welfare that underlies
integration. In fact, nobody denies this statement, yet one hears quite
different arguments made in regards to Ukraine. It is especially
obvious, for example, in the German mass media that openly warn against
the re-establishment of Russian influence over Ukraine, talk about the
pusillanimous inaction of Europe, which, unlike the US, has been
ignoring such a strategically important country, and so on.
The impression of a geopolitical renaissance is reinforced by the fact
that in German newspapers and broadcasts Lviv, for example, goes under
its earlier name Lemberg (it would be fair to notice that it has
nothing to do either with the revolution in Kyiv or with the awakening
of expansionist ambitions in Berlin, it merely reflects German
toponymic tradition). One of high-standing officials in the
Eurocommission in Berlin noted to the author of these lines that
Germans are, apparently, being again overpowered by the "Croatian
syndrome". In 1991 Bonn recognized the independence of Croatia that had
long been attracted to the German sphere of influence, which became one
of the factors contributing to the beginning of the Balkan bloodshed.
In any case, the situation in Ukraine allows the EU to act, this time,
towards its "new neighborhood".
Second, it was exactly the threat of serious destabilization in its
large (even by European standards) neighbor that made the EU redouble
its activity. And, again, it seems comparable to the politics in the
Balkans in the 1990s: since the times of well-known "contact groups" in
Yugoslavia and different "plans" (Vance-Owen, Owen-Stoltenberg,
Bildt-Holbrooke, etc.) European diplomacy has not been as frantically
active as it is now in Kyiv. Moreover, in regards to the number of
high-level mediators Ukraine, it seems, surpasses Bosnia. This is all
given, according to another Eurocommission official, that "until now we
could not even imagine how complex and diverse Ukraine it, we were not
ready for such a turn of events."
Europe is trying to compensate for its unreadiness by active
involvement in the crisis mediation process at this stage. The
possibility of the Ukrainian split seriously worries Europeans. It is
so worrisome that they, as it seems, may, despite all their sympathies
towards Yushchenko, pressure him into a compromise with his opponents.
Third, Russia is fast losing its bastions in Ukraine. Having placed a
substantial and aggressive bet on Yanukovych, the Kremlin, as it turns
out, is absolutely not ready for any other outcome than that of its
favorite's victory. All of Moscow's attempts to regain the initiative
either through forecasting a forthcoming disaster or through flirting
with separatist regions in the East have so far had an opposite effect:
Europe initiated its own mediation efforts, and a substantial number of
Kuchma-Yanukovych's supporters, frightened by all that is going on,
have condemned separatism. If the EU and the OSCE are successful in
making the parties in the conflict reach a compromise, then Moscow can
literally forget about having any political influence in Ukraine.
And, since it was Russia's insistence on the idea that the Ukrainian
elections are a crucial geopolitical battle, one must admit that Russia
is on the verge of a total defeat.
Given all this, Kremlin's passivity is a striking contrast to its own
hyperactivity just a few days ago. At the crucial moment Russia,
seeking a dominant position, is represented in Kyiv by such a
politician as Boris Gryzlov. The only name for it is capitulation.
The outcome of the battle for Ukraine can have substantial influence
on European politics. A pro-Western candidate (and it does not have to
be Viktor Yushchenko) will make European leaders pay more attention to
the country that was taken quite lightly a mere month ago. Electoral
fervor has unnaturally stimulated interest towards Kyiv, having
increased its importance (without even exaggerating it) for the Old
World. This, without saying, does not mean that Ukraine will be offered
some fast-track integration within the EU. Yet, nor does it mean that
Ukraine's chances of joining this EU equal to those of New Zealand, as
Romano Prodi once stated.
In the meantime, the wave of protests regarding the forthcoming
negotiations regarding the Turkish membership is growing. These
negotiations will last at least ten years, and, furthermore the
Eurocomimssion intends to introduce a special clause allowing it to
terminate the negotiations at any time should Ankara's reforms, in
Brussels' opinion, regress. If, in the meantime, the situation in
Ukraine changes, then the rhetorical question "Why conditionally
European Turkey, and not surely European Ukraine" may become a
practical reality. Although this, as they say in fairy-tales, is a
different story.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use your web browser to search the archives, control your subscription
options, and more. Visit and bookmark the SEELANGS Web Interface at:
http://seelangs.home.comcast.net/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the SEELANG
mailing list