Irony in Grossman's VSE TECHET

[Peitlova Katarina]

It could have been  " gorodskoj" as far as "oblastnoj,rajonnyj " and 
"verxovnyj".

Best wishes,

Katarina
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Edward M Dumanis" <dumanis at BUFFALO.EDU>
To: <SEELANGS at BAMA.UA.EDU>
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: [SEELANGS] Irony in Grossman's VSE TECHET


>I think that you meant "gorsovet" and "gorodskoj sovet" in your message.
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Edward Dumanis
>
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Peitlova Katarina wrote:
>
> ........./snip/.........
>
>>
>> I think that they are open with Pinegin BECAUSE of his
>> deputatskij znachok. If he wasn't  DEPUTAT  he were not aloud to enter in 
>> inturistskij restoran. There's no irony in it.
>>
>> As for  deputat v verxovnyj sovet?. I think he could be  deputat 
>> rajsoveta.
>
> ........./snip/.........
>
>> There were sovets in every city: Leningradskij rajonnyj sovet narodnyx 
>> deputatov.
>>
>> That's only how I interpretate the text.
>>
>> Best wishes
>>
>>
>> Katarina Peitlova PhDr.
>> Italy
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Use your web browser to search the archives, control your subscription
>  options, and more.  Visit and bookmark the SEELANGS Web Interface at:
>                    http://seelangs.home.comcast.net/
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Use your web browser to search the archives, control your subscription
  options, and more.  Visit and bookmark the SEELANGS Web Interface at:
                    http://seelangs.home.comcast.net/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------