Igor Tale found or lost? (STRAKHOV'S POINT)
Richard Schultz
schultz1970 at YAHOO.COM
Wed Jun 10 14:37:48 UTC 2009
Steven and Olga, I share your skepticism.
Olga, you seem to have firsthand knowledge of the Golovin version of the Skazanie.
What, exactly, did Golovin add to make the text more like the Igor Tale? That is, in what way is Golovin's text closer than the Zadonshchina to the Igor Tale? Looking through my editions of the Skazanie, I find no mention of Golovin's version anywhere, although Tvorogov has an entry about Golovin in Entsiklopediia Slova o polku Igoreve. He says nothing in his entry to cast real doubt on the authenticity of Golovin's version.
Richard
----- Original Message ----
From: Prof Steven P Hill <s-hill4 at ILLINOIS.EDU>
To: SEELANGS at bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 2:18:15 AM
Subject: [SEELANGS] Igor Tale found or lost? (Strakhov's point)
Dear colleagues and Prof Strakhov:
Mann's new publication is definitely worth our attention. At the
same time, I think it should be taken with a grain of salt, and we
can thank Olga Strakhov for being the first (or one of the first)
to mention that grain of salt. It's a question that nagged me
previously, but which I did not post on this list-server till now.
So hosannahs to Prof Strakhov for standing up and posting it.
Namely, where is the ORIGINAL mss of that particular "Skazanie"
which Golovin edited (?) and published in 1835. We all could hope
that the particular mss which Golovin found (and later lost?)
could be precisely photo-reproduced (in addition to the edited
[?] version which Golovin did publish)...
With a bit of skepticism,
Steven P Hill,
University of Illinois.
________________________________________________________
Date: Wed 10 Jun 00:42:28 CDT 2009
From: <LISTSERV at bama.ua.edu>
Subject: Re: GETPOST SEELANGS
To: "Steven P. Hill" <s-hill4 at ILLINOIS.EDU>
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:46:46 -0400
From: "Strakhov, Olga" <strakhov at GSD.HARVARD.EDU>
Subject: Re: Another Igor Tale hoax?
As far as I understand, in his book Robert Mann compares Slovo o Polku Igoreve
with Nikolai Golovin's edition of the Skazanie of Mamaevom poboishche.
Nikolai Golovin published his version of Skazanie in Moscow in 1835 (see
"Skazanie o poboishche velikago kniazia Dimitriia Ioannovicha Donskago s
nechestivym tsarem Mamaem: i s bezchislennymi tatary na Donu, na reke
Nepriadve, na pole Kulikove, 1380 goda 8-go sentiabria: sochinenie XV stoletiia",
izdal Nikolai Golovin [Moskva: V tip. A. Semena, 1835]; quoted after the copy of
the Houghton Library, Harvard).
Golovin's text in some respect is closer to Slovo than the Zadonshchina.
The problem is that the original manuscript of Golovin's edition has never been
found. Hence, it is quite possible (and more than possible, since this version is
unique in many readings) that Golovin either "corrected" or "reconstructed" his
text so that it might look more "Igor'-like".
In short, Golovin's version of the Skazanie is well known, but is not considered to
be reliable.
Olga Strakhov
_____________________________________________________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use your web browser to search the archives, control your subscription
options, and more. Visit and bookmark the SEELANGS Web Interface at:
http://seelangs.home.comcast.net/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use your web browser to search the archives, control your subscription
options, and more. Visit and bookmark the SEELANGS Web Interface at:
http://seelangs.home.comcast.net/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the SEELANG
mailing list