pereVEdeno?
H.P. Houtzagers
h.p.houtzagers at rug.nl
Tue Mar 8 15:26:21 UTC 2011
Charles Mills wrote:
> I am not nearly as surprised by the stress shift as I am by the vowel
> quality that results. For reasons I am sure you will appreciate, I
> would have maybe expected pereVYOdeno, uVYOzena, vNYOseny, etc.
> instead.
>
> C. Mills
> Pacific Grove, California
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Use your web browser to search the archives, control your subscription
> options, and more. Visit and bookmark the SEELANGS Web Interface at:
> http://seelangs.home.comcast.net/
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
I'm not sure that everybody would expect that. First the e-ë alternation
is due to a change of e > ë that took place in Russian centuries ago
but it does not have to be a productive alternation in contemporary
Russian. Second, even in that very remote past the law e > ë did not
work before a soft consonant.
Peter Houtzagers
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Use your web browser to search the archives, control your subscription
options, and more. Visit and bookmark the SEELANGS Web Interface at:
http://seelangs.home.comcast.net/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the SEELANG
mailing list