pereVEdeno?

H.P. Houtzagers h.p.houtzagers at rug.nl
Tue Mar 8 15:26:21 UTC 2011


Charles Mills wrote:
> I am not nearly as surprised by the stress shift as I am by the vowel
> quality that results.  For reasons I am sure you will appreciate, I
> would have maybe expected pereVYOdeno, uVYOzena, vNYOseny, etc.
> instead.
>
> C. Mills
> Pacific Grove, California
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Use your web browser to search the archives, control your subscription
>   options, and more.  Visit and bookmark the SEELANGS Web Interface at:
>                     http://seelangs.home.comcast.net/
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>   
I'm not sure that everybody would expect that. First the e-ë alternation 
is due to a change of e > ë  that took place in Russian centuries ago 
but it does not have to be a productive alternation in contemporary 
Russian. Second, even in that very remote past the law e > ë did not 
work before a soft consonant.

Peter Houtzagers

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Use your web browser to search the archives, control your subscription
  options, and more.  Visit and bookmark the SEELANGS Web Interface at:
                    http://seelangs.home.comcast.net/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------



More information about the SEELANG mailing list