More plural (plural enclitics)

[Rory M Larson]

John wrote:
>     Ma     Da/Dh   IO       Wi       Tu       Of  Bi
> 1   --      --     --       wi       12           --
> 12  riNt    *pi    wi       wi       --           daha/tu
> 2   riNt    *pi    wi       wi       pu           daha/tu
> 3   krE     *pi    wi/ne    wi/irE   h(e)lE   tu  daha/tu

1 stands for exclusive, 12 for inclusive, correct?

And the 12 in the 1 position for Tutelo means you don't recall
what it is, but that it is the same for both forms of we?

Rory





                      Koontz John E
                      <John.Koontz at colorad        To:       Siouan List <siouan at lists.colorado.edu>
                      o.edu>                      cc:
                      Sent by:                    Subject:  Re: More plural (plural enclitics)
                      owner-siouan at lists.c
                      olorado.edu


                      06/18/2003 12:40 AM
                      Please respond to
                      siouan






On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Koontz John E wrote:
> No, but I think the second person plural enclitic is *=pV, where V might
> be u (from memory).

    Ma     Da/Dh   IO       Wi       Tu       Of  Bi
1   --      --     --       wi       12           --
12  riNt    *pi    wi       wi       --           daha/tu
2   riNt    *pi    wi       wi       pu           daha/tu
3   krE     *pi    wi/ne    wi/irE   h(e)lE   tu  daha/tu

This is a quick summary and may be erronious in some points.  It is
probably incomplete (in Of, at least) and I will not attempt to describe
the principles or syntax of combinations where they can occur.  Bi daha is
the object plural, while tu is the subject plural.  I suspect that the
medial (e) in Tutelo is epenthetic, as it is often missing.  I've obvious
simplified the treatment of Da and Dh.  I've omitted Cr and Hi, though I
seem to recall that Hi is something like a?a.

JEK