inclusive/exclusive

[shokooh Ingham]

This is what I found strange about the use of 'dual'
here to
Bruce


> To me 'dual' refers to nominal or pronominal
> category in which both members of the duality have
> to occupy the same argument category, i.e., "I see
> you" wouldn't qualify as a dual in the Indo-European
> (and I suspect Americanist) tradition.  Both
> participants would have to share subjecthood or
> objecthood, etc.  As I recall Dixon's person
> categories are 1st, 2nd, 3rd and inclusive.
>  
> Bob
> 



		
___________________________________________________________ 
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com