Original meaning/use of Lakota term Wateca?

ROOD DAVID S David.Rood at Colorado.EDU
Tue Feb 24 22:55:19 UTC 2009


Yes, the "t" is aspirated, and in Lakota it also means 'young' or 'new'. 
I've never figured out the semantics that relates it to 'leftovers', but 
I'm tempted to think the morpheme break might be other than we expect. 
Could it be related somehow to "wa-yute" 'eat intrans' (surface wote)? 
The aspiration on the "t" is not explained by that, of course.  Can it be 
morphologically analyzed differently in any other language?


David S. Rood
Dept. of Linguistics
Univ. of Colorado
295 UCB
Boulder, CO 80309-0295
USA
rood at colorado.edu

On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, Rankin, Robert L wrote:

> Well, if it's cognate with Omaha /ttega/ it is.   Bob
>
> ________________________________
>
> From: owner-siouan at lists.Colorado.EDU on behalf of Rory M Larson
> Sent: Tue 2/24/2009 11:00 AM
> To: siouan at lists.Colorado.EDU
> Subject: RE: Original meaning/use of Lakota term Wateca?
>
>
>
> Bob wrote:
>> The Dakota specialists on the list can probably give a much
>> better answer to your question, but I thought I'd mention that
>> the related word in Kaw and Omaha, "tega" means roughly 'new',
>> 'something new' -- which seems almost the opposite of 'left overs'.
>> Interesting meaning shift.
>
> The t in wateca is aspirated then, correct?
>
> Rory
>
>



More information about the Siouan mailing list