wanonscopakmik

[shokooh Ingham]

Yes it does thank you.  In fact my friend over in America had corrected my spelling.  I always mistake an American pronunciation of -o- for an -a- .  I was once introduced to a Lakota lady called "Bonny Black Bear" and wondered why she was called "Barny".  The same mistake.  The name is mentioned in Bright and is said to mean "rocks at the bend in the lake" in Mohican.

Bruce


________________________________
 From: George Wilmes <george.wilmes at GMAIL.COM>
To: SIOUAN at listserv.unl.edu 
Sent: Sunday, 6 October 2013, 21:51
Subject: Re: wanonscopakmik
 


Hi Bruce, I see on Google Maps that there is a lake called "Wononskopomuc" just south of Lakeville, Connecticut. Does that spelling help? (I don't have Bright's dictionary.)

The usgs.gov site has a great place-name lookup facility, but it is currently down due to the government shutdown.




On Sun, Oct 6, 2013 at 10:51 AM, shokooh Ingham <shokoohbanou at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Thanks Bob,
>Yes, as you say, I am catching up on a huge backlog, all very interesting.  I have been over in Connecticut for three weeks and couldn't use the internet for fear of upsetting my hosts computer, both of us being novices.  Anyway it's all very interesting. I managed to look up the local mountain range , the takonic range, and found in Bright's dictionary that it is from tahkenek 'in the woods', e meaning shewa, and is probably Mohican.  However I was not able to find the local lake 'Lakeville lake', which I was told was called wanonscopamik. It looks like a good Algonquian work, but I couldn't find anything similar in Bright.  Any ideas anyone?
>Bruce
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: "Rankin, Robert L." <rankin at KU.EDU>
>To: SIOUAN at listserv.unl.edu 
>Sent: Saturday, 5 October 2013, 23:19
>Subject: BL and GL initials.
> 
>
>
>Hi Bruce,
>
>I think you must be catching up on a lot of back email.  :-)
>
>As you get more up-to-date I think you'll find the answers to all your questions about these clusters.  The back-and-forth went on for quite some time.  I collected all vocabulary from Dakota, Omaha, Ponca, Osage, Kansa and Quapaw that has a reflex of Mississippi
 Valley Siouan GL or BL.  Accent in these words DOES in fact fall on the initial syllable in all but Dakotan, exactly as you predict it should.  It's only Dakota that's changed.
>
>Best,
>
>Bob
>
>
>________________________________
> 
>From: Siouan Linguistics [SIOUAN at listserv.unl.edu] on behalf of shokooh Ingham [shokoohbanou at YAHOO.CO.UK]
>Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2013 2:38 PM
>To: SIOUAN at listserv.unl.edu
>Subject: Re: Locatives and wa- problems.
>
>
>I don't get that.  If gluha and bluha were three syllables, wouldn't the stress be glUha and blUha rather than gluhA and bluhA?
>Bruce
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: "Rankin, Robert L." <rankin at KU.EDU>
>To: SIOUAN at listserv.unl.edu 
>Sent: Monday, 9 September 2013, 16:15
>Subject: Re: Locatives and wa- problems.
>
>
>
>I think you'd be wrong.  By accent placement rules and by morphological analysis the GL and BL clusters count as two syllables.  The little phonetic tics are immaterial.  Fortunately or unfortunately the Gs all go back to full syllables, mostly KI while the Bs of the BL clusters all go back to WA or WI.  All were morphemes also.  Ordinarily the prehistory of these things might not matter, but the accent rules still seem to be able to treat the Gs and Bs as morae for purposes of assigning stress synchronically.  This is especially true of Hochunk which, assuming Ken Miner was right, is a mora counting language.  I'm guessing that Dakotan is too.  
>
>
>________________________________
> 
>
>
>> Phonetically, there is a schwa in there.  But phonologically, I would count glV- as one syllable.
>
>Actually, that's backwards.  Phonetically BLV and GLV may form single syllables but phonologically they count as two for the reasons cited above.  \
>
>It gets worse, of course.  If the structure is CVglV the syllabification rules for Siouan languages assign the /g/ phonetically to the second syllable along with the initial member of all other CC clusters.  I remember telling an Australian linguist that and being laughed at because he believed that syllable boundaries could be derived from a "universal."  It's all very messy, but it's a fact that CL clusters can behave as two syllables for various phonological purposes and perhaps as single syllables for yet other purposes. 
>
>
>Bob
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/siouan/attachments/20131007/38befd0e/attachment.html>