Thought about organizing by signs.

Steve Slevinski slevin at SIGNPUDDLE.NET
Thu Feb 22 19:19:00 UTC 2007


Hi Adam,

Signs are sorted by their SignSpelling Sequence.  Both of these signs 
should have the same SignSpelling Sequence (right hand, left hand, 
touch), so they could appear in either order.

-Steve

Adam_Frost_ wrote:
> 	
>
> I was just wondering how these two signs (PLUS and TO) would be 
> ordered. They both have the same symbols, and the placing of the 
> symbols is exactly the same except for a slight shift of the dominate 
> hand. Which would go first in the SSS? (I think that is what it is 
> called.)
>
> Adam
>
> PS Happy Birthday Val!
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Load message into SignText 
> <http://www.signbank.org/signpuddle/signtext/signtext.html?list=01-01-001-01-02-09,104,61,01-01-001-01-02-03,100,67,02-01-001-01-01-01,85,63,%0A%0D%0A01-01-001-01-02-09,106,93,01-01-001-01-02-03,108,92,02-01-001-01-01-01,93,88,sign-3,0> 
>
>
> Courtesy of SignBank.org <http://www.signbank.org>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20070222/cc8442e7/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 191 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20070222/cc8442e7/attachment.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/png
Size: 183 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listserv.linguistlist.org/pipermail/sw-l/attachments/20070222/cc8442e7/attachment-0001.png>


More information about the Sw-l mailing list