AW: [sw-l] Eye-Blinks
sw at PASSITONSERVICES.ORG
Mon Jan 22 23:15:46 UTC 2007
However, the more complicated it is to write frequently occurring
items, the more frustrating it can become. Eyeblinks are a frequent
part of SLs. However, the face is already a tight space even though it
is one of the most complex part of SL. So the more simple we can keep
it, the better. IMHO.
That is why I favor both methods: one is phonemic and the other is more
On Jan 22, 2007, at 16:32, eric mead wrote:
> I support this idea (see below). The more symbols added, the less
> likely any kind of standard is to evolve... which is useful for
> developing a writing system meant to be widespread.
>> From: "Ingvild Roald" <ingvild.roald at STATPED.NO>
>> Reply-To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>> To: sw-l at majordomo.valenciacc.edu
>> Subject: Re: AW: [sw-l] Eye-Blinks
>> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:09:27 +0100
>> >Hi all,
>> >I thought we could do with just what we have?
>> >Namely, the face circle with eyes and the little v arrowhead beside
>> >eye. This we get both blinking with one eye, and blinking with two.
>> >It would be understood that the eyes open again after a short while
>> >This would be easy to read and to write
>> >See attached
>> ><< blink-both-eyes.php.png >>
>> ><< blink-right-eye.png >>
> From photos to predictions, The MSN Entertainment Guide to Golden
More information about the Sw-l