<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html;charset=windows-1252">
<title></title>
</head>
<body>
Comments below .... <br>
<br>
Stephen Slevinski wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="midNAEOKJKHILHAJGBAFDIGGEHBCEAA.slevin@pudl.info">
<title></title>
<meta content="text/html; " http-equiv="Content-Type">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1400">
<div><span class="042111801-01042004"><font size="2" color="#0000ff"
face="Arial">Stuart,</font></span></div>
<div><span class="042111801-01042004"></span> È /div>
<div><span class="042111801-01042004"><font size="2" color="#0000ff"
face="Arial">Thanks. È I appreciate you pointing out the disadvantages
of glossing. È Do you have any examples of SignWriting that demonstrate
these limitations?</font></span></div>
<div><span class="042111801-01042004"></span> <br>
</div>
</blockquote>
No problem. È I did a lot of glossing early on especially with people
who do not know SignWriting. È I found these out as I was trying to
write some of these things down with glossing. È I became quite
dissatisfied with glossing.<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="midNAEOKJKHILHAJGBAFDIGGEHBCEAA.slevin@pudl.info">
<div><span class="042111801-01042004"><font size="2" color="#0000ff"
face="Arial">The use of SignWriting is still evolving. È I can see the
problem if people become accustomed to simplifing their language to fit
an imperfect tool. È They may view SignWriting as flawed, when it is
actually the glossing. <br>
</font></span></div>
</blockquote>
Yes. It is possible. È That is why I think we have to figure out a way
to make SignWriting the basis for composition. È I like what Valerie has
done with grouping symbols by using 1-10. -~ Perhaps there is a way to
capitalize on that. The only input I have ever had was from one deaf
person who thought it should be done like CAD programs. È Other than
that, I have not really sat down to analyze and brainstorm on that much
yet.<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="midNAEOKJKHILHAJGBAFDIGGEHBCEAA.slevin@pudl.info">
<div><span class="042111801-01042004"><font size="2" color="#0000ff"
face="Arial"> </font></span></div>
<div><span class="042111801-01042004"></span> È /div>
<div><span class="042111801-01042004"><font size="2" color="#0000ff"
face="Arial">I hope that they would become interested in SignWriting
and then dissatisfied with glossing. È This would lead to people willing
to invest the time to learn a real tool like SignWriter. È Or they may
even create a tool better than SignWriter.</font></span></div>
<div><span class="042111801-01042004"></span> <br>
</div>
</blockquote>
I agree. È I think two critical features that might lead to success for
the next SignWriter program (Daniel, this can be version 2.0 if it is a
problem, but I have some ideas so let's talk ...) is for it to be able
to include some capability to include graphic images and have variable
sizes of SignWriting text. Other features could come È later as the
program expands.<br>
<br>
These features are needed so that literature in SignWriting can be
created more easily and be able to add line drawings, illustrations, or
just other graphical images that can add a nice creative touch to the
document. That certainly adds some complication on the programming
side, but it will streamline the production of SW documents so that it
does not necessarily have to be put into Word, OpenOffice.org, AbiWord,
or whatever other wordprocessors people use these days.<br>
<br>
Those are the things I hope to see myself. È I have brainstormed on
these things, but we need to find ways to help Daniel get the core
programming complete (input, display, printing, etc.) before we can add
these things.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
<br>
Stuart<br>
</body>
</html>