<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Val,<br>
<br>
It came through as a PNG this time. I've been able to embed other
graphic formats inside an email as well as attach them, so I'm not sure
why TIFF is being used that way. Maybe it's a Mac oddity. :-)<br>
<br>
Bill<br>
<br>
<br>
Valerie Sutton wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid16B02596-E3D8-11D8-B6C8-000A959F2614@signwriting.org">SignWriting
List
<br>
August 1, 2004
<br>
<br>
Bill Reese wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="cite">This came through as an attached TIFF file
for me.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Hello Bill and Everyone!
<br>
Yes. I am surprised myself to see that it is TIFF. In the old days,
TIFF used to be a very fancy data-intensive way to create beautiful
photos...now there seems to be a new kind of TIFF that is very
tiny...relating to pasting inside email messages.
<br>
<br>
So, I am learning the differences between pasting a sign inside email
messages, and attaching them as a separate graphic. I think when they
are pasted that creates the TIFF format, but when they are attached,
they keep their original formatting, like PNG...
<br>
<br>
So here is the same sign again, but this time, instead of pasting it, I
attached it to the email message as a separate graphic. It is a PNG. Is
it a PNG for you this time, Bill?
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<hr width="90%" size="4"><br>
<center><img src="cid:part1.02080603.03080004@tampabay.rr.com"></center>
<p><br>
</p>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>