<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-2" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
ok,<br>
<br>
I read the lessons, but there is no answer which one prefer to use. <br>
Ok, you tend to use single one.<br>
Thanks<br>
<br>
Honza<br>
<br>
Valerie Sutton wrote:<br>
<blockquote cite="midb09991f34c8b65dbcdd1fe34a16e4c58@signwriting.org"
type="cite">SignWriting List
<br>
February 3, 2005
<br>
<br>
Honza from the Czech Republic wrote:
<br>
<blockquote>I managed to find it a while ago (Stefan showed me)
<br>
I have another question - what is the different of this movement? If I
see right, both goes in the same way. If so, which one is to be
preffered?
<br>
<!-- 0000,0000,EEED --><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://signbank.org/signpuddle/sgn-EO/image.php?build=02-05-001-02-01-03,0,0">http://signbank.org/signpuddle/sgn-EO/image.php?build=02-05-001-02-01-03,0,0</a>
<br>
<!-- 0000,0000,EEED --><a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://signbank.org/signpuddle/sgn-EO/image.php?build=02-03-001-02-01-03,0,0">http://signbank.org/signpuddle/sgn-EO/image.php?build=02-03-001-02-01-03,0,0</a>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
QUESTION: Which do we use when movement is straight to the side...the
double stemmed arrow or the single stemmed arrow?
<br>
<br>
ANSWER: Both are correct. It is your choice. Generally, we tend to use
the single-stemmed arrow more, when we can, because it is less to
write...Look in the Lessons in SignWriting Textbook on this web page:
<br>
<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://signwriting.org/lessons/lessonsw/103%20Straight-Movement.html">http://signwriting.org/lessons/lessonsw/103%20Straight-Movement.html</a>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<hr size="4" width="90%"><br>
<center><img src="cid:part1.02040107.08070508@ruce.cz"></center>
<p><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>