<html>
<body>
Good evening,<br><br>
Not used as I am to lists as these, I hope I am doing everything as it
ought to be done. Can I use for example bold, italics, lists,
hyperlinks and horizontal lines?<br><br>
<b>Introduction<br>
</b>To introduce myself, I am a guy, 24 years old, who is studying at the
Technical University in Delft (Netherlands) and doing a master thesis
<i>"<b>Iconic language & Cognitive Psychology</b>"</i>.
After a bachelor in Electronical Engineering I decided to do the master
"Media & Knowledge Engineering" because I am very
interested in issues that are at the border of informatics, psychology
and mathematics: advanced algorithms, clifford algebra / networks;
evolution of complex systems; hyper operators; inconsistent mathematics;
linguistic modalities; semiotics. It's the new or interdisciplinary
character of most topics that does catch my interest. Iconic
communication falls into the realm of semiotics and linguistic
modalities, and because gestural languages do have more or less the same
position in regard to spoken languages as an iconic language. <br>
As last introductionary remark I want to state that I am studying an
iconic language, not a "pictographic" language. I am well aware
of the impossibilities involved in such a language. My approach regards
languages as <a href="http://www.cs.wpi.edu/~nemleem/">VIL</a>.<br>
I hope you can help me with providing theoretical background information
about the SignWriting project. I'd appreciate that very much.<br><br>
<hr>
<b><br>
Sign language is a real language | and I don't doubt that ;-)<br>
</b>I now of the struggle to let sign languages fall under the 'real'
languages, and people that suggested that only spoken, 'natural'
languages are worth the term 'language'. That's not where I come
from.<br><br>
<b>SignWriting & corresponding issues with an iconic language<br>
</b>What I would like to know are the problems that we'll encounter with
writing an iconic language:
<ul>
<li>What is the <b>lexicon size</b> of a 'common' sign language (say ASL)
that is notated by SignWriting? What is the dictionary size of ASL if
notated by SignWriting?
<li>SignWriting is a feature-based notation, so concepts can be arranged
in some <b>order</b>. I saw five entrees
(<a href="http://signbank.org/dictionaries/pictdict/">link</a>); why
where these entrees chosen?
<li>If people write in SignWriting notation using a kind of editor, how
can they <b>input </b>signs? Is there an application that uses a normal
QWERTY keyboard with sign(-feature)s assigned to letters? (I think of
e.g. coupling frequently used SignWriting units to frequently used
letters.) Or do you only use mouse drag-and-drop events or translation
tools?
<li>Notating a (sign) language does most often also lead to
classification of the concepts in that very language. Did the scientists
behind the SignWriting project classify, did they use some kind of
conceptual <b>hierarchy</b>? Or was this hierarchy automatically derived
from the 'natural sign language' and had the experts nothing to do with
classifying the language itself? (I think classifying is necessary if
there exist a SignWriting editor, people should chose gestures / concepts
easily from a library / dictionary)
<li>Did some people - afterwards - study the notation itself? I know
SignWriting arose out of the need to describe exactly what kind of
movements / gestures people make. Did they <b>improve </b>parts of the
SignWriting <b>notation </b>over time? Why and how? (I know of the
comparison study with Stokoe Notation and HamNoSys.) Do you have studies
about the specific <b>representation </b>used by SignWriting? And some
side issue: how are the signs stored / represented digitaly?
</ul>Thanks a lot in advance. Eagerly awaiting a reply,<br><br>
Andy<br>
<x-sigsep><p></x-sigsep>
Anne C. van Rossum<br>
1006916<br>
<a href="http://www.tudelft.nl/">TUDelft</a> -
<a href="http://new.ewi.tudelft.nl/">EWI</a>/<a href="http://academics.its.tudelft.nl/nl/">ITS</a>
- Master <a href="http://msc.its.tudelft.nl/mke/">Media & Knowledge </a><a href="http://msc.its.tudelft.nl/mke/">engineering</a>, Thesis <a href="http://elektron.et.tudelft.nl/~avrossum/study.xml">Iconic Language & Cognitive Psychology<br>
</a><font size=1><x-tab> </x-tab>languages: Nederlands + English + Espaņol; nationality: Dutch; gender: male</font> </body>
</html>