<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2900.2627" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY
style="WORD-WRAP: break-word; khtml-nbsp-mode: space; khtml-line-break: after-white-space"
bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Thanks, Val, but I doubt also your proposal is correct becuase
the movement does not end with a "bend" but straight forward (with two loops
althoug there can be one loop only).</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2>Lucy</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>Hello Everyone, and Lucyna -</DIV>
<DIV>What about this? I have attached a diagram with a second version, that
includes a movement forward with a loop...That symbol should also have a
double-loop version, but that double-loop symbol has not been added to the
IMWA yet. In the month of June, I plan to add all the movement symbols that
are missing in the IMWA...</DIV>
<DIV><BR class=khtml-block-placeholder></DIV>
<DIV>But the traveling loop symbol is easier to write and more compact...What
do you think?</DIV>
<DIV><BR class=khtml-block-placeholder></DIV>
<DIV><BR class=khtml-block-placeholder></DIV>
<DIV><BR class=khtml-block-placeholder></DIV>
<DIV><SPAN><IMG src="cid:003f01c563bd$ba8dc870$319a1f53@LUCIA"></SPAN></DIV>
<DIV><BR class=khtml-block-placeholder></DIV>
<DIV><BR class=khtml-block-placeholder></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>