<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
Val,<br>
I seem to remember someone awhile back saying that handwriting that
kind of circle was a bit difficult, as it tended to get lost in the
symbol.<br>
I've come up with a plausible adaptation rather quickly, though , so I
believe that circle could be very amenable to progressive change.<br>
<br>
<img src="cid:part1.07020203.06060200@tampabay.rr.com" title="" alt=""
width="113" height="113"><br>
<br>
Bill<br>
<br>
<br>
Valerie Sutton wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid7D93FF2A-8B6C-4462-AC38-0F780E728C1B@signwriting.org">SignWriting
List <br>
September 25, 2005 <br>
<br>
Charles Butler wrote: <br>
<blockquote type="cite">Yes!!! very clear. <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Tini Pel wrote: <br>
<blockquote type="cite">I like that, Valerie, <br>
Tini. <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Hello Everyone! <br>
Ha! I didn't expect such rapid approval ;-) <br>
<br>
Here is an interesting summary of this specific symbol...Looking at
these three choices, which do you like better? We could include all
three variations in the IMWA if we feel we have to...Right now I am
curious what List members think at first glance...What seems easiest
to read? Val ;-) <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<hr width="90%" size="4"><br>
<center><img src="cid:part2.07030906.02070103@tampabay.rr.com"></center>
<p><br>
<br>
</p>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>