<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1">
<title></title>
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Actually, Stuart, it's quite possible that the angled lines themselves
would indicate the shaded part. If the shaded part is on the right
side, just reverse the construction.<br>
<br>
I believe there's been a lot of thought put into handwritten
SignWriting. Val needs to confirm that any handwritten symbol is not
confused with other symbols and is consistent with the basic premises
of SignWriting. Just giving it a few minutes of thought, however, and
trying to be consistent with what I did with the ten hand, I came up
with the following for the "e" hand:<br>
<br>
<img src="cid:part1.07070504.06060605@tampabay.rr.com" title="" alt=""
width="396" height="255"><br>
<br>
Again, my only purpose with doing the ten hand symbol was to use a
possible progression and change of signwriting as a validation argument
for the symbol Val proposed. I'm not suggesting that we change
things. It is intriguing to think about possible future constructions
though! :-)<br>
<br>
Bill<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
Stuart Thiessen wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mide731c194bf1fb4dc02e446ee098928ee@passitonservices.org">Bill,
<br>
<br>
I like that. I'll have to practice it. The shading could come after
that has been set up. Do you have a similar handwriting strategy for
the handshapes that correspond with the ASL "B" and "E"? I'd be
interested to see what you have been doing on that.
<br>
<br>
Thanks,
<br>
<br>
Stuart
<br>
<br>
On Sep 26, 2005, at 21:40, Bill Reese wrote:
<br>
<br>
<blockquote>Val,
<br>
I seem to remember someone awhile back saying that handwriting that
kind of circle was a bit difficult, as it tended to get lost in the
symbol.
<br>
I've come up with a plausible adaptation rather quickly, though , so
I believe that circle could be very amenable to progressive change.
<br>
<br>
<unknown.png>
<br>
<br>
Bill
<br>
<br>
<br>
Valerie Sutton wrote:
<br>
<blockquote>SignWriting List
<br>
September 25, 2005
<br>
<br>
Charles Butler wrote:
<br>
<blockquote>Yes!!! very clear.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Tini Pel wrote:
<br>
<blockquote>I like that, Valerie,
<br>
Tini.
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
Hello Everyone!
<br>
Ha! I didn't expect such rapid approval ;-)
<br>
<br>
Here is an interesting summary of this specific symbol...Looking at
these three choices, which do you like better? We could include all
three variations in the IMWA if we feel we have to...Right now I am
curious what List members think at first glance...What seems easiest
to read? Val ;-)
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<unknown.gif>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<Tenhand.png><mime-attachment></blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>