<HTML><BODY style="word-wrap: break-word; -khtml-nbsp-mode: space; -khtml-line-break: after-white-space; ">SignWriting List<DIV>March 21, 2006</DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; "><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; ">Hello Charles and Everyone!</DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Arial; min-height: 16px; ">Actually Charles, your question is a different one. Your question is related to how we sort dictionaries, and that is another topic...</DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Arial; min-height: 16px; "><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Arial; min-height: 16px; ">We were discussing terminology...words in the English language that describe SignWriting...two different subjects!</DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Arial; min-height: 16px; "><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Arial; min-height: 16px; ">Steve and Cherie and I were discussing the difference between the term SignWriting and the term International Movement Writing Alphabet (the IMWA)...and the equivalents in the spoken language world...namely the term Roman Alphabet and the term International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA)...</DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Arial; min-height: 16px; "><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Arial; min-height: 16px; ">But your questions are related specifically to how you sort a dictionary and I will answer that in a day or so, I promise! Right now, I want to finish discussing terminology...Let's give your message below a new subject title...like Sorting Dictionaries? Val ;-)</DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Arial; min-height: 16px; "><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Arial; min-height: 16px; "><BR class="khtml-block-placeholder"></DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; ">--------------------</DIV><DIV style="margin-top: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0px; font: normal normal normal 14px/normal Arial; min-height: 16px; "><BR></DIV><DIV><BR><DIV><DIV>On Mar 21, 2006, at 12:53 PM, Charles Butler wrote:</DIV><BR class="Apple-interchange-newline"><BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><DIV>I asked the same question Steve as I am sorting for a multilingual dictionary in ASL, Libras, English, and Portuguese.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>I started with my corpus of 750 signs and began to sort them using the Sign Writing for Everyday Use as a guide, and Valerie's article as part of the process. In so doing, we will need:</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>1) A set order of handshapes within the basic 10 groupings.</DIV> <DIV>2) A set order of orientations within the basic 6</DIV> <DIV>3) A set order of rotations within the basic 8.</DIV> <DIV>4) A set order of contacts</DIV> <DIV>5) A set order of movements</DIV> <DIV>6) A set order of spatial locations</DIV> <DIV>7) A set order of body contacts</DIV> <DIV>8) A set order of facial expressions</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>And imbedded in the above, what one does with two hands in a sign, presumably start with the dominant hand, sort through the above, add the second hand, and sort through the abov! e. I did that with my corpus of 750 and was able to get down to granular between the sign "confusao" and "complicado" where the only differences are intensity and speed. In my dictionary, I placed smooth before quick, but others might do differently. </DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><IMG alt="complicado" src="http://signbank.org/signpuddle/sgn-BR/dict/sl/complicado.png" align="middle" border="0">complicado <IMG alt="confusão" src="http://signbank.org/signpuddle/sgn-BR/dict/sl/confus%E3o.png" align="middle" border="0">confusao</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><BR><BR><B><I>Steve Slevinski <<A href="mailto:slevin@signpuddle.net">slevin@signpuddle.net</A>></I></B> wrote:</DIV> <BLOCKQUOTE class="replbq" style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Hi Val,<BR><BR>Thanks for starting a message on terminology. I'm not using the <BR>terminology correctly, so this is very helpful.<BR><BR><BR><BR>I'm a bit confused by equating the roman alphabet to SignWriting. The <BR>roman alphabet! is a sequence of ordered symbols. SignWriting is a <BR>system for writing signed languages. I think the roman alphabet is <BR>similar to the IMWA. And I think that SignWriting is similar to what is <BR>taught in English class.<BR><BR><BR><BR><BR>I'm confused by what SignSpelling actually means. Is SignSpelling what <BR>you use, what you do, or what you get? Is SignSpelling for writing or <BR>sorting? I thought that SignSpelling was a subset of SignWriting that <BR>encompasses how to write sign and how to sequentially list the symbols <BR>in a sign for sorting.<BR><BR>The word spelling has 2 definitions. 1) The act of the person who <BR>spells a word. 2) The way a word is spelled. It seems to me that <BR>SignSpelling is the system of rules that a person uses while he is <BR>spelling(1) a sign which results in a spelling(2) of a sign. Spelling <BR>is both his action(1) and his result(2), but he uses the rules of <BR>SignSpelling for guidance while he works. <BR><BR>Many definition! s of "spell" mention the sequential order of the letters, <BR>but that is because of cultural bias. The word spell comes from older <BR>words that mean "to talk" or "to relate".<BR>Middle English /spellen<BR>/Old French /espeller/<BR>Old English /spellian/<BR><BR>It is interesting to note that "gospel" is derived from "good talk".<BR><BR>If I was reading a document, I would hope that the words (or signs) were <BR>spelled correctly. With most spoken languages, a word's spelling is <BR>used for sorting because words are spelled sequentially. However, the <BR>symbols in a signs do not appear sequentially, but in 2 dimensional <BR>space. I consider this 2 dimensional representation of a sign to be the <BR>sign's spelling. If we had a Sign Spelling Bee, the contestants would <BR>watch a person perform a sign and would probably use a blackboard to <BR>write the sign.<BR><BR>But this brings us to the question of how to sort signs in a <BR>dictionary. We need a way to write the symbols ! of a sign in a <BR>sequential order. The SignSpelling Guidelines 2004 is a great reference <BR>for this <BR>(<A href="http://www.signwriting.org/archive/docs2/sw0145-SignSpelling-2004.pdf">http://www.signwriting.org/archive/docs2/sw0145-SignSpelling-2004.pdf</A>).<BR><BR>And that's why I was using the terms spelling and sequence when talking <BR>about a sign. A sign's spelling is what you would find in a sign <BR>language text. A sign's sequence (or sort order) is a list of a sign's <BR>symbols that can be used for sorting.<BR><BR>-Steve<BR><BR><BR>Valerie Sutton wrote:<BR>> SignWriting List<BR>> March 21, 2006<BR>><BR>> Dear SW List Members!<BR>> Recently someone asked me to explain SignWriting Terminology (the <BR>> English words I use to describe different aspects of SignWriting).<BR>><BR>> So I will create a chart of the terms I use in English. I hope we can <BR>> translate these terms into other spoken languages later.<BR>><BR>> Here is a beginning...More will be coming later...continued next <BR>> message...<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------<BR>><BR>> No virus found in this incoming message.<BR>> Checked by AVG Free Edition.<BR>> Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.2.6/287 - Release Date: 3/21/2006<BR>> <BR></BLOCKQUOTE><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV><BR></DIV></BODY></HTML>