<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Ron,<br>
Just out of curiosity, why do you prefer Signpuddle 1.0 over 1.5? Is
it because 1.0 still has all the graphic entries from the old DOS
version of Signwriting or what is there about Signpuddle 1.0 that makes
it more suitable to the way you work?<br>
<br>
Bill<br>
<br>
<br>
Ronald Dettloff wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:851275.73140.qm@web81713.mail.mud.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style>
<div
style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">Yes
please keep it.<span style="font-family: symbol;"><br>
<br>
Sign Puddle TM 6448 signs United States and Canada<br>
<br>
with the translate box (see attached file)<br>
<br>
That is the one we use.<br>
<br>
<br>
</span><br>
<br>
<div> </div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>Rev. Ronald H. Dettloff, 20880 Ten Mile Road, St. Clair Shores,
MI 48080</div>
<div>Other Web links: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
rel="nofollow" target="_blank"
href="http://theshoreschurch.org/ME2/Audiences/Default.asp">http://theshoreschurch.org/ME2/Audiences/Default.asp</a>
<strong><br>
</strong></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div
style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;"><br>
<br>
<div
style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">-----
Original Message ----<br>
From: Steve Slevinski <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:slevin@signpuddle.net"><slevin@signpuddle.net></a><br>
To: SignWriting List <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:sw-l@majordomo.valenciacc.edu"><sw-l@majordomo.valenciacc.edu></a><br>
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2007 9:06:32 PM<br>
Subject: Re: [sw-l] old version of SignPuddle<br>
<br>
Hi Ron,<br>
<br>
Do you need me to re-enable SignMaker for SignPuddle 1.0? If so, which
dictionaries?<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
-Steve<br>
<br>
Ronald Dettloff wrote:
<blockquote type="cite">
<div
style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 12pt;">Please
don't remove SignPuddle 1.0 Dana and I prefer it and it works much
better with what we are doing. I was afraid this might happen one day.
Our project depends on Sign Puddle 1.0<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br>
</div>
</div>
<pre wrap="">
<hr size="4" width="90%">
____________________________________________
SW-L SignWriting List
Post Message
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:SW-L@majordomo.valenciacc.edu">SW-L@majordomo.valenciacc.edu</a>
List Archives and Help
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/">http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/</a>
Change Email Settings
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l">http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l</a></pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>