<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif;font-size:12pt"><div>On the opposite end of the spectrum is Brazil, where the tireless efforts of Marianne Stumpf, Ronice Quadros, and many others has created a ready pool of SignWriting being used at all levels of education. Brazilian Sign Language is considered to be a native language (as of 2002) and native Deaf are required to be the primary teachers of interpreters. SW was adopted by the Deaf Community at its national conference in 2000 and has taken off all over the place since. The social validation of Deaf clubs has really made a difference.</div><div><br></div><div>When I taught a seminar on SignWriting at Deaf Way II, the criticism that was often heard was that the conference was overwhelmingly ASL-centric and I was one of the few presenters that "assumed" that not only did more
than one sign language exist, but that they all deserved to be treated as "native languages" with their own writing systems. </div><div><br></div><div>Neither HamNoSys or SignType are used as everyday tools by the Deaf in their own cultures, they are linguistic tools only. Only SW has actually been welcomed, once the Deaf have learned it, to become an everyday writing system, based on the usage of the Deaf as primary users.</div><div><br></div><div>Charles Butler</div><div><br></div><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><br><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><font size="2" face="Tahoma"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> KJ <kjoanne403@signwriting.org><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> SignWriting List <sw-l@majordomo.valenciacc.edu><br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Sat,
November 7, 2009 1:10:29 AM<br><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> Re: [sw-l] common criticisms of signwriting?<br></font><br>
<style></style>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">I've run into most of the criticisms mentioned; one
other that I've heard (and I realize it's completely wrong, but it is the
opinion of one of the top people in Deaf education in Alberta) is that trying to
learn SignWriting as well as the majority spoken
language is "cognitive overload".</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">Another "issue" brought up by a teacher I spoke to
is that a lot of the hearing-impaired kids she teaches have no language when
they start school; their hearing parents don't (and often won't) sign.
Since they're not starting with a signed language knowledge base, and
because the hearing parents generally don't want their kids involved with
the Deaf community and have no desire to sign with them, this teacher
really doesn't see any point in using SSW in her classroom.</font></div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2"></font> </div>
<div><font face="Arial" size="2">KJ</font></div>
<blockquote style="PADDING-RIGHT:0px;PADDING-LEFT:5px;MARGIN-LEFT:5px;BORDER-LEFT:#000000 2px solid;MARGIN-RIGHT:0px;">
<div style="FONT:10pt arial;">----- Original Message ----- </div>
<div style="BACKGROUND:#e4e4e4;FONT:10pt arial;"><b>From:</b>
<a rel="nofollow" title="erhoffma@oberlin.edu" ymailto="mailto:erhoffma@oberlin.edu" target="_blank" href="mailto:erhoffma@oberlin.edu">Erika
Hoffmann</a> </div>
<div style="FONT:10pt arial;"><b>To:</b> <a rel="nofollow" title="sw-l@majordomo.valenciacc.edu" ymailto="mailto:sw-l@majordomo.valenciacc.edu" target="_blank" href="mailto:sw-l@majordomo.valenciacc.edu">sw-l@majordomo.valenciacc.edu</a>
</div>
<div style="FONT:10pt arial;"><b>Sent:</b> Thursday, November 05, 2009 1:40
PM</div>
<div style="FONT:10pt arial;"><b>Subject:</b> [sw-l] common criticisms of
signwriting?</div>
<div><br></div>Hi! I mentioned the last time I posted that I'm working on a
paper<br>about SignWriting for presentation at the American
Anthropological<br>Association meeting in December.<br>One of the things I'm
thinking about is the ways in which Signwriting<br>and Signwriten documents
can be used to critique dominant ideologies<br>about language and writing that
are common in Linguistics and related<br>disciplines. At the same time, I want
to note that the radical nature<br>of the script can sometimes be a social
barrier to its adoption by<br>signers (particularly because of the historical
relationship between<br>the Linguistic validation of sign languages with the
social validation<br>of Deaf signers).<br>I'm wondering if any of you would be
willing to share some of the ways<br>you've heard people criticize or dismiss
SSW (or point me to places<br>where these opinions are aired). I'm looking for
people's concerns<br>about the script itself (i.e., "it looks like
hieroglyphics") rather<br>than the other common arguments about the need for a
script at all<br>(i.e., "Deaf people can just write in
English").<br>Thanks!<br>Best,<br>Erika<br><br><br><br>____________________________________________<br><br>SW-L
SignWriting List<br><br>Post Message<br><a rel="nofollow" ymailto="mailto:SW-L@majordomo.valenciacc.edu" target="_blank" href="mailto:SW-L@majordomo.valenciacc.edu">SW-L@majordomo.valenciacc.edu</a><br><br>List
Archives and Help<br><span><a target="_blank" href="http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/">http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/</a></span><br><br>Change
Email Settings<br><span><a target="_blank" href="http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l">http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l</a></span><br><br></blockquote>
</div></div><div style="position:fixed"></div>
<!-- cg2.c903.mail.sp2.yahoo.com compressed/chunked Sat Nov 7 05:23:20 PST 2009 -->
</div></body></html>