<html>
<head>
<style><!--
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
font-size: 10pt;
font-family:Verdana
}
--></style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'>
I wonder, what tipped the scales and convinced the Deaf in Brazil that SSW was an important and useful writing system? I'd like to know the history of that situation more deeply and how perhaps it could influence the progress of SignWriting here in the U.S.<BR>
<BR>
I'm convinced that SignWriting, as I use it to teach ASL classes to hearing people has been truly beneficial, especially in pronunciation of signs and as a recall aid, but I am also very interested in its benifits to Deaf students as I'm a teacher of the Deaf as well. It looks like there is some pretty hefty research backing SSW and its use with Deaf students in Brazil.<BR>
<BR>
There seems to be a basic underlying paranoia of a system invented by a hearing person, at least in the U.S. This type of polar opposition, based on the origin of the system, as opposed to its merits, may be particularly strong here in America. <BR><BR>Natasha Escalada-Westland, M.Ed. (D/HH), Certified Interpreter - NIC<BR><BR><BR> <BR><BR><BR><BR> <BR>
<HR id=stopSpelling>
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 15:12:48 -0800<BR>From: chazzer3332000@yahoo.com<BR>Subject: Re: [sw-l] common criticisms of signwriting?<BR>To: sw-l@majordomo.valenciacc.edu<BR><BR>
<STYLE>
.ExternalClass DIV
{;}
</STYLE>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: 'times new roman', 'new york', times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV>On the opposite end of the spectrum is Brazil, where the tireless efforts of Marianne Stumpf, Ronice Quadros, and many others has created a ready pool of SignWriting being used at all levels of education. Brazilian Sign Language is considered to be a native language (as of 2002) and native Deaf are required to be the primary teachers of interpreters. SW was adopted by the Deaf Community at its national conference in 2000 and has taken off all over the place since. The social validation of Deaf clubs has really made a difference.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>When I taught a seminar on SignWriting at Deaf Way II, the criticism that was often heard was that the conference was overwhelmingly ASL-centric and I was one of the few presenters that "assumed" that not only did more than one sign language exist, but that they all deserved to be treated as "native languages" with their own writing systems. </DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Neither HamNoSys or SignType are used as everyday tools by the Deaf in their own cultures, they are linguistic tools only. Only SW has actually been welcomed, once the Deaf have learned it, to become an everyday writing system, based on the usage of the Deaf as primary users.</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV>Charles Butler</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><BR>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif; FONT-SIZE: 12pt"><FONT size=2 face=Tahoma>
<HR SIZE=1>
<B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">From:</SPAN></B> KJ <kjoanne403@signwriting.org><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">To:</SPAN></B> SignWriting List <sw-l@majordomo.valenciacc.edu><BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Sent:</SPAN></B> Sat, November 7, 2009 1:10:29 AM<BR><B><SPAN style="FONT-WEIGHT: bold">Subject:</SPAN></B> Re: [sw-l] common criticisms of signwriting?<BR></FONT><BR>
<STYLE>
</STYLE>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>I've run into most of the criticisms mentioned; one other that I've heard (and I realize it's completely wrong, but it is the opinion of one of the top people in Deaf education in Alberta) is that trying to learn SignWriting as well as the majority spoken language is "cognitive overload".</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Another "issue" brought up by a teacher I spoke to is that a lot of the hearing-impaired kids she teaches have no language when they start school; their hearing parents don't (and often won't) sign. Since they're not starting with a signed language knowledge base, and because the hearing parents generally don't want their kids involved with the Deaf community and have no desire to sign with them, this teacher really doesn't see any point in using SSW in her classroom.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>KJ</FONT></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial; BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4"><B>From:</B> <A title=erhoffma@oberlin.edu href="mailto:erhoffma@oberlin.edu" rel=nofollow>Erika Hoffmann</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=sw-l@majordomo.valenciacc.edu href="mailto:sw-l@majordomo.valenciacc.edu" rel=nofollow>sw-l@majordomo.valenciacc.edu</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, November 05, 2009 1:40 PM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [sw-l] common criticisms of signwriting?</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>Hi! I mentioned the last time I posted that I'm working on a paper<BR>about SignWriting for presentation at the American Anthropological<BR>Association meeting in December.<BR>One of the things I'm thinking about is the ways in which Signwriting<BR>and Signwriten documents can be used to critique dominant ideologies<BR>about language and writing that are common in Linguistics and related<BR>disciplines. At the same time, I want to note that the radical nature<BR>of the script can sometimes be a social barrier to its adoption by<BR>signers (particularly because of the historical relationship between<BR>the Linguistic validation of sign languages with the social validation<BR>of Deaf signers).<BR>I'm wondering if any of you would be willing to share some of the ways<BR>you've heard people criticize or dismiss SSW (or point me to places<BR>where these opinions are aired). I'm looking for people's concerns<BR>about the script itself (i.e., "it looks like hieroglyphics") rather<BR>than the other common arguments about the need for a script at all<BR>(i.e., "Deaf people can just write in English").<BR>Thanks!<BR>Best,<BR>Erika<BR><BR><BR><BR>____________________________________________<BR><BR>SW-L SignWriting List<BR><BR>Post Message<BR><A href="mailto:SW-L@majordomo.valenciacc.edu" rel=nofollow>SW-L@majordomo.valenciacc.edu</A><BR><BR>List Archives and Help<BR><SPAN><A href="http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/">http://www.signwriting.org/forums/swlist/</A></SPAN><BR><BR>Change Email Settings<BR><SPAN><A href="http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l">http://majordomo.valenciacc.edu/mailman/listinfo/sw-l</A></SPAN><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV></DIV> </body>
</html>